Radical dissents in international criminal trials

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

International criminal law, for much of its history, has been a law characterized by dissents. However, international law scholarship has largely ignored the role of the dissenting opinion in shaping the discourse of international criminal law. This article critically examines the nature and function of dissents at international criminal tribunals at a particularly crucial moment in the life of these courts, when the project of establishing accountability for mass atrocity through criminal trials is increasingly under attack. The article argues that the dissenting opinion is a crucial legal device that can have a transformative potential in international criminal adjudication through its creation of a civic space for contestation that paradoxically shores up the legitimacy of the international criminal trial. To this end, it constructs a discrete category of dissenting opinions at international criminal courts: 'radical dissents'. The content and rhetorical style of a radical dissent enables actors invested in the project of international criminal justice to use it as a vital dissentient voice both within and outside the courtroom. Agents who operate within the confines of the legal trial, such as defendants, lawyers, appellate chambers and future judges, may channel its authority to challenge the idiom in which the majority judgment speaks. Likewise, the radical dissent could provide a legal language through which academics, victims, civil society and other affected communities continue to grapple with constructing and coming to terms with events that defy human understanding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1163-1186
Number of pages24
JournalEuropean Journal of International Law
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 31 2017

Fingerprint

international law
criminal law
International Criminal Court
chamber
lawyer
civil society
legitimacy
justice
responsibility
Law
event
discourse
history
language
community

Cite this

Radical dissents in international criminal trials. / Jain, Neha.

In: European Journal of International Law, Vol. 28, No. 4, 31.12.2017, p. 1163-1186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0b3303cf7a024ca59f55a49c4a916204,
title = "Radical dissents in international criminal trials",
abstract = "International criminal law, for much of its history, has been a law characterized by dissents. However, international law scholarship has largely ignored the role of the dissenting opinion in shaping the discourse of international criminal law. This article critically examines the nature and function of dissents at international criminal tribunals at a particularly crucial moment in the life of these courts, when the project of establishing accountability for mass atrocity through criminal trials is increasingly under attack. The article argues that the dissenting opinion is a crucial legal device that can have a transformative potential in international criminal adjudication through its creation of a civic space for contestation that paradoxically shores up the legitimacy of the international criminal trial. To this end, it constructs a discrete category of dissenting opinions at international criminal courts: 'radical dissents'. The content and rhetorical style of a radical dissent enables actors invested in the project of international criminal justice to use it as a vital dissentient voice both within and outside the courtroom. Agents who operate within the confines of the legal trial, such as defendants, lawyers, appellate chambers and future judges, may channel its authority to challenge the idiom in which the majority judgment speaks. Likewise, the radical dissent could provide a legal language through which academics, victims, civil society and other affected communities continue to grapple with constructing and coming to terms with events that defy human understanding.",
author = "Neha Jain",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1093/ejil/chx072",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1163--1186",
journal = "European Journal of International Law",
issn = "0938-5428",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radical dissents in international criminal trials

AU - Jain, Neha

PY - 2017/12/31

Y1 - 2017/12/31

N2 - International criminal law, for much of its history, has been a law characterized by dissents. However, international law scholarship has largely ignored the role of the dissenting opinion in shaping the discourse of international criminal law. This article critically examines the nature and function of dissents at international criminal tribunals at a particularly crucial moment in the life of these courts, when the project of establishing accountability for mass atrocity through criminal trials is increasingly under attack. The article argues that the dissenting opinion is a crucial legal device that can have a transformative potential in international criminal adjudication through its creation of a civic space for contestation that paradoxically shores up the legitimacy of the international criminal trial. To this end, it constructs a discrete category of dissenting opinions at international criminal courts: 'radical dissents'. The content and rhetorical style of a radical dissent enables actors invested in the project of international criminal justice to use it as a vital dissentient voice both within and outside the courtroom. Agents who operate within the confines of the legal trial, such as defendants, lawyers, appellate chambers and future judges, may channel its authority to challenge the idiom in which the majority judgment speaks. Likewise, the radical dissent could provide a legal language through which academics, victims, civil society and other affected communities continue to grapple with constructing and coming to terms with events that defy human understanding.

AB - International criminal law, for much of its history, has been a law characterized by dissents. However, international law scholarship has largely ignored the role of the dissenting opinion in shaping the discourse of international criminal law. This article critically examines the nature and function of dissents at international criminal tribunals at a particularly crucial moment in the life of these courts, when the project of establishing accountability for mass atrocity through criminal trials is increasingly under attack. The article argues that the dissenting opinion is a crucial legal device that can have a transformative potential in international criminal adjudication through its creation of a civic space for contestation that paradoxically shores up the legitimacy of the international criminal trial. To this end, it constructs a discrete category of dissenting opinions at international criminal courts: 'radical dissents'. The content and rhetorical style of a radical dissent enables actors invested in the project of international criminal justice to use it as a vital dissentient voice both within and outside the courtroom. Agents who operate within the confines of the legal trial, such as defendants, lawyers, appellate chambers and future judges, may channel its authority to challenge the idiom in which the majority judgment speaks. Likewise, the radical dissent could provide a legal language through which academics, victims, civil society and other affected communities continue to grapple with constructing and coming to terms with events that defy human understanding.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042912270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042912270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ejil/chx072

DO - 10.1093/ejil/chx072

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85042912270

VL - 28

SP - 1163

EP - 1186

JO - European Journal of International Law

JF - European Journal of International Law

SN - 0938-5428

IS - 4

ER -