Questioning explicit properties of implicit individuals in knowledge representation

C. E. Westerberg, C. J. Marsolek

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

Abstract

Dienes and Perner argue that the explicit representation of an individual to which a property is attributed requires explicit representation of the attributed property. The reasons for this conclusion are similar to the reasons why another of their conclusions may be considered suspect: A property may be explicit without an explicit representation of an individual or the predication of the property to an individual. We question the latter conclusion and draw connections to neurophysiological and cognitive evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)788-789
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume22
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Cite this