Abstract
Quasi-random graphs can be informally described as graphs whose edge distribution closely resembles that of a truly random graph of the same edge density. Recently, Shapira and Yuster proved the following result on quasi-randomness of graphs. Let k ≥ 2 be a fixed integer, α 1,...,α k be positive reals satisfying ∑ iα i = 1 and (α 1,...,α k)≠(1/k,...,1/k), and G be a graph on n vertices. If for every partition of the vertices of G into sets V 1,...,V k of size α 1n,...,α kn, the number of complete graphs on k vertices which have exactly one vertex in each of these sets is similar to what we would expect in a random graph, then the graph is quasi-random. However, the method of quasi-random hypergraphs they used did not provide enough information to resolve the case (1/k,...,1/k) for graphs. In their work, Shapira and Yuster asked whether this case also forces the graph to be quasi-random. Janson also posed the same question in his study of quasi-randomness under the framework of graph limits. In this paper, we positively answer their question.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 124-145 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Random Structures and Algorithms |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2012 |
Keywords
- Cut properties
- Pseudo-random graphs
- Quasi-random graphs
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Quasi-randomness of graph balanced cut properties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS