Quantitative SPECT/CT Metrics in Early Prediction of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE Treatment Response in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients

Onur Tuncer, Daniel Steinberger, Joseph Steiner, Madeleine Hinojos, Stephanie Y. Rhee, Brad Humphrey, Farhad Jafari, Zuzan Cayci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Our objective is to explore quantitative imaging markers for early prediction of treatment response in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) undergoing [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy. By doing so, we aim to enable timely switching to more effective therapies in order to prevent time-resource waste and minimize toxicities. Methods: Patients diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic, progressive, well-differentiated, receptor-positive GEP-NETs who received 4 sessions of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE were retrospectively selected. Using SPECT/CT images taken at the end of treatment sessions, we counted all visible tumors and measured their largest diameters to calculate the tumor burden score (TBS). Up to 4 target lesions were selected and semiautomatically segmented. Target lesion peak counts and spleen peak counts were measured, and normalized peak counts were calculated. Changes in TBS (∆TBS) and changes in normalized peak count (∆nPC) throughout treatment sessions in relation to the first treatment session were calculated. Treatment responses were evaluated using third-month CT and were binarized as progressive disease (PD) or non-PD. Results: Twenty-seven patients were included (7 PD, 20 non-PD). Significant differences were observed in ∆TBSsecond-first, ∆TBSthird-first, and ∆TBSfourth-first (where second-first, third-first, and fourth-first denote scan number between the second and first, third and first, and fourth and first [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE treatment cycles), respectively) between the PD and non-PD groups (median, 0.043 vs. 20.049, 0.08 vs. 20.116, and 0.109 vs. 20.123 [P 5 0.023, P 5 0.002, and P, 0.001], respectively). ∆nPCsecond-first showed significant group differences (mean, 20.107 vs. 20.282; P 5 0.033); ∆nPCthird-first and ∆nPCfourth-first did not reach statistical significance (mean, 20.122 vs. 20.312 and 20.183 vs. 20.405 [P 5 0.117 and 0.067], respectively). At the optimal threshold, ∆TBSfourth-first exhibited an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.957, achieving 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity. ∆TBSsecond-first and ∆TBSthird-first reached AUCs of 0.793 and 0.893, sensitivities of 71.4%, and specificities of 85% and 95%, respectively. ∆nPCsecond-first, ∆nPCthird-first, and ∆nPCfourth-first showed AUCs of 0.764, 0.693, and 0.679; sensitivities of 71.4%, 71.4%, and 100%; and specificities of 75%, 70%, and 35%, respectively. Conclusion: ∆TBS and ∆nPC can predict [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE response by the second treatment session.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1584-1590
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume65
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
COPYRIGHT © 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Keywords

  • GEP-NETs
  • Lutathera
  • SPECT/CT
  • [Lu]Lu-DOTATATE
  • treatment response
  • tumor burden score

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative SPECT/CT Metrics in Early Prediction of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE Treatment Response in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this