Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantitative criticalism: Guidelines for conducting transformative quantitative family science research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Historically, research has been used by systems of authority to marginalize and oppress minoritized populations. Family scientists have recently begun the work of disentangling themselves from these oppressive legacies (e. g., White supremacist, sexist, heterosexist, cisgenderist, etc.). As such, the field is at a vital crux in which there is a need to challenge prevailing quantitative methodological assumptions and practices in order to address and disrupt how statistical analyses can shape family sciences away from a social-justice agenda. Drawing upon principles of critical social theory, critical race theory, and Black Feminist scholarship, this article elaborates on how family scientists can utilize Quantitative Criticalism, or QuantCrit, as a framework for conducting social justice-orientated quantitative research. We conclude by illustrating how the tenets of QuantCrit can be utilized throughout the research process. It is our hope that readers will identify moments in their own scholarship in which these tenets can be applied.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-441
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Family Theory and Review
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 National Council for Family Relations.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • QuantCrit
  • anti-oppressive praxis
  • critical social theory
  • discrimination
  • marginalization
  • quantitative criticalism
  • social justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative criticalism: Guidelines for conducting transformative quantitative family science research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this