Quantification of noninvasive fat reduction: A systematic review

Sogyong L. Auh, Sanjana Iyengar, Alexandra Weil, Diana Bolotin, Todd V. Cartee, Jeffrey S. Dover, Ian Maher, Joseph F. Sobanko, Joel L. Cohen, Emily Poon, Murad Alam

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

Background and Objective: Noninvasive fat reduction appears effective, but there are various methods for quantifying changes. The objective of this review is to assess comparative utility measures of subcutaneous fat. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Articles describing noninvasive fat reduction were searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus electronic databases on two dates (January 28, 2014 and February 16, 2016). Titles of studies and abstracts were screened for eligibility. Manual review was performed by two investigators to detect those that: (1) included original data; (2) were randomized controlled trials, or prospective or retrospective cohort studies; (3) quantified fat outcomes; and (4) enrolled at least 10 subjects. Results: Of 1,057 retrieved articles, 36 met criteria. Most reported four or more measurement techniques. Circumference measurements were most commonly cited. Other objective techniques, like caliper thickness, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and three-dimensional (3D) photography, were also used. Common subjective methods were evaluation of standardized photographs by blinded raters and patient satisfaction surveys. Conclusions: For quantifying noninvasive fat reduction, all available methods had significant limitations: photographic comparisons were subjective; circumference or caliper measurements were confounded; ultrasound was operator dependent; MRI was expensive; computed models and simulations were in early development. As new technologies are developed, the need for reliable, accurate and practical measures of subcutaneous fat will increase. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:96–110, 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-110
Number of pages15
JournalLasers in Surgery and Medicine
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Fats
Subcutaneous Fat
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Photography
Patient Satisfaction
MEDLINE
Lasers
Cohort Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials
Retrospective Studies
Research Personnel
Databases
Technology

Keywords

  • adipocytolysis
  • cryolipolysis
  • fat
  • measurement
  • non-invasive
  • quantification
  • radiofrequency
  • reduction
  • systematic review
  • ultrasound

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

Cite this

Auh, S. L., Iyengar, S., Weil, A., Bolotin, D., Cartee, T. V., Dover, J. S., ... Alam, M. (2018). Quantification of noninvasive fat reduction: A systematic review. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 50(2), 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22761

Quantification of noninvasive fat reduction : A systematic review. / Auh, Sogyong L.; Iyengar, Sanjana; Weil, Alexandra; Bolotin, Diana; Cartee, Todd V.; Dover, Jeffrey S.; Maher, Ian; Sobanko, Joseph F.; Cohen, Joel L.; Poon, Emily; Alam, Murad.

In: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Vol. 50, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 96-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Auh, SL, Iyengar, S, Weil, A, Bolotin, D, Cartee, TV, Dover, JS, Maher, I, Sobanko, JF, Cohen, JL, Poon, E & Alam, M 2018, 'Quantification of noninvasive fat reduction: A systematic review', Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 96-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22761
Auh SL, Iyengar S, Weil A, Bolotin D, Cartee TV, Dover JS et al. Quantification of noninvasive fat reduction: A systematic review. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2018 Feb 1;50(2):96-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22761
Auh, Sogyong L. ; Iyengar, Sanjana ; Weil, Alexandra ; Bolotin, Diana ; Cartee, Todd V. ; Dover, Jeffrey S. ; Maher, Ian ; Sobanko, Joseph F. ; Cohen, Joel L. ; Poon, Emily ; Alam, Murad. / Quantification of noninvasive fat reduction : A systematic review. In: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 50, No. 2. pp. 96-110.
@article{dd7cb5c3309e439b97b0e0262e424b7d,
title = "Quantification of noninvasive fat reduction: A systematic review",
abstract = "Background and Objective: Noninvasive fat reduction appears effective, but there are various methods for quantifying changes. The objective of this review is to assess comparative utility measures of subcutaneous fat. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Articles describing noninvasive fat reduction were searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus electronic databases on two dates (January 28, 2014 and February 16, 2016). Titles of studies and abstracts were screened for eligibility. Manual review was performed by two investigators to detect those that: (1) included original data; (2) were randomized controlled trials, or prospective or retrospective cohort studies; (3) quantified fat outcomes; and (4) enrolled at least 10 subjects. Results: Of 1,057 retrieved articles, 36 met criteria. Most reported four or more measurement techniques. Circumference measurements were most commonly cited. Other objective techniques, like caliper thickness, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and three-dimensional (3D) photography, were also used. Common subjective methods were evaluation of standardized photographs by blinded raters and patient satisfaction surveys. Conclusions: For quantifying noninvasive fat reduction, all available methods had significant limitations: photographic comparisons were subjective; circumference or caliper measurements were confounded; ultrasound was operator dependent; MRI was expensive; computed models and simulations were in early development. As new technologies are developed, the need for reliable, accurate and practical measures of subcutaneous fat will increase. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:96–110, 2018.",
keywords = "adipocytolysis, cryolipolysis, fat, measurement, non-invasive, quantification, radiofrequency, reduction, systematic review, ultrasound",
author = "Auh, {Sogyong L.} and Sanjana Iyengar and Alexandra Weil and Diana Bolotin and Cartee, {Todd V.} and Dover, {Jeffrey S.} and Ian Maher and Sobanko, {Joseph F.} and Cohen, {Joel L.} and Emily Poon and Murad Alam",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/lsm.22761",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "96--110",
journal = "Lasers in Surgery and Medicine",
issn = "0196-8092",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantification of noninvasive fat reduction

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Auh, Sogyong L.

AU - Iyengar, Sanjana

AU - Weil, Alexandra

AU - Bolotin, Diana

AU - Cartee, Todd V.

AU - Dover, Jeffrey S.

AU - Maher, Ian

AU - Sobanko, Joseph F.

AU - Cohen, Joel L.

AU - Poon, Emily

AU - Alam, Murad

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Background and Objective: Noninvasive fat reduction appears effective, but there are various methods for quantifying changes. The objective of this review is to assess comparative utility measures of subcutaneous fat. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Articles describing noninvasive fat reduction were searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus electronic databases on two dates (January 28, 2014 and February 16, 2016). Titles of studies and abstracts were screened for eligibility. Manual review was performed by two investigators to detect those that: (1) included original data; (2) were randomized controlled trials, or prospective or retrospective cohort studies; (3) quantified fat outcomes; and (4) enrolled at least 10 subjects. Results: Of 1,057 retrieved articles, 36 met criteria. Most reported four or more measurement techniques. Circumference measurements were most commonly cited. Other objective techniques, like caliper thickness, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and three-dimensional (3D) photography, were also used. Common subjective methods were evaluation of standardized photographs by blinded raters and patient satisfaction surveys. Conclusions: For quantifying noninvasive fat reduction, all available methods had significant limitations: photographic comparisons were subjective; circumference or caliper measurements were confounded; ultrasound was operator dependent; MRI was expensive; computed models and simulations were in early development. As new technologies are developed, the need for reliable, accurate and practical measures of subcutaneous fat will increase. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:96–110, 2018.

AB - Background and Objective: Noninvasive fat reduction appears effective, but there are various methods for quantifying changes. The objective of this review is to assess comparative utility measures of subcutaneous fat. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Articles describing noninvasive fat reduction were searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Scopus electronic databases on two dates (January 28, 2014 and February 16, 2016). Titles of studies and abstracts were screened for eligibility. Manual review was performed by two investigators to detect those that: (1) included original data; (2) were randomized controlled trials, or prospective or retrospective cohort studies; (3) quantified fat outcomes; and (4) enrolled at least 10 subjects. Results: Of 1,057 retrieved articles, 36 met criteria. Most reported four or more measurement techniques. Circumference measurements were most commonly cited. Other objective techniques, like caliper thickness, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and three-dimensional (3D) photography, were also used. Common subjective methods were evaluation of standardized photographs by blinded raters and patient satisfaction surveys. Conclusions: For quantifying noninvasive fat reduction, all available methods had significant limitations: photographic comparisons were subjective; circumference or caliper measurements were confounded; ultrasound was operator dependent; MRI was expensive; computed models and simulations were in early development. As new technologies are developed, the need for reliable, accurate and practical measures of subcutaneous fat will increase. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:96–110, 2018.

KW - adipocytolysis

KW - cryolipolysis

KW - fat

KW - measurement

KW - non-invasive

KW - quantification

KW - radiofrequency

KW - reduction

KW - systematic review

KW - ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037984293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037984293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lsm.22761

DO - 10.1002/lsm.22761

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 29210446

AN - SCOPUS:85037984293

VL - 50

SP - 96

EP - 110

JO - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

JF - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

SN - 0196-8092

IS - 2

ER -