Punishment and Democracy: Disenfranchisement of Nonincarcerated Felons in the United States

Jeff Manza, Christopher Uggen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

87 Scopus citations

Abstract

As levels of criminal punishment have risen in the United States, more and more citizens have been disenfranchised because of a felony conviction. This paper provides an overview and analysis of the unique practice of felon disenfranchisement in the United States today. We focus in particular on the political impact of disenfranchising large numbers of nonincarcerated felons—those who have served their entire sentences and those living in their home communities while completing a term of probation or parole. Our discussion is organized around three key issues relating to felon disenfranchisement: (1) the historical and legal origins of this practice; (2) its practical political impact on recent elections; and, (3) the racial dynamics that color both the history and contemporary effects of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. We discuss how felon disenfranchisement laws in many states appear to be out of step with both international practices and public opinion in the United States and consider contemporary policy proposals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-505
Number of pages15
JournalPerspectives on Politics
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Punishment and Democracy: Disenfranchisement of Nonincarcerated Felons in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this