Public land managers and sustainable urban vegetation: The case of low-input turfgrasses

Michael R. Barnes, Kristen C Nelson, Amanda J. Meyer, Eric Watkins, Stacy A. Bonos, Brian P Horgan, William A. Meyer, James Murphy, Chengyan Yue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In urban ecosystems, public land managers are responsible for making complex decisions about vegetation and the management of public spaces that have ecological, economic, and social consequences. Across the globe, the question is whether to move from commonly used vegetation options that require multiple inputs (e.g. water, fertilizer, pesticides) and intensive management (e.g. mowing, re-seeding) to more sustainable, low-input, low-management vegetation varieties. Little is known about urban public land managers’ perceptions and beliefs about low-input turfgrass (e.g. fine fescue species) and their willingness to encourage such environmentally sustainable practices for public lands or support low-input vegetation conversion programs for private residential yards in their cities. We surveyed U.S. public land managers in Minnesota and New Jersey metropolitan areas about their preferences and beliefs regarding low-input turfgrass, specifically cool season fine fescue, and related those beliefs to opportunities for urban environmental sustainability. Overall managers showed favorable views towards low-input turfgrasses suggesting an interest in conversion to more sustainable management. Also, they demonstrated significant support of municipal programs to convert both public and private lands to low-input turfgrasses. Educational attainment and employer type were found to be responsible for most differing viewpoints among managers. This study suggests public land managers may not be a barrier to sustainable vegetation change, but rather important facilitators. More work needs to be done to understand this phenomenon globally and evaluate public land managers’ roles in the transition to low-input vegetation as well as capacity to anticipate future challenges for vegetation in the urban ecosystem, more broadly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)284-292
Number of pages9
JournalUrban Forestry and Urban Greening
Volume29
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

public lands
turf grasses
managers
vegetation
urban ecosystem
Festuca
educational attainment
private lands
private land
ecological economics
mowing
ecosystems
environmental sustainability
public space
land
public
seeding
metropolitan area
pesticides
sowing

Keywords

  • Fine fescue
  • Management
  • Public land managers
  • Sustainability
  • Turfgrass
  • Urban vegetation

Cite this

Public land managers and sustainable urban vegetation : The case of low-input turfgrasses. / Barnes, Michael R.; Nelson, Kristen C; Meyer, Amanda J.; Watkins, Eric; Bonos, Stacy A.; Horgan, Brian P; Meyer, William A.; Murphy, James; Yue, Chengyan.

In: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, Vol. 29, 01.2018, p. 284-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barnes, Michael R. ; Nelson, Kristen C ; Meyer, Amanda J. ; Watkins, Eric ; Bonos, Stacy A. ; Horgan, Brian P ; Meyer, William A. ; Murphy, James ; Yue, Chengyan. / Public land managers and sustainable urban vegetation : The case of low-input turfgrasses. In: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. 2018 ; Vol. 29. pp. 284-292.
@article{b9a8e3fc2469429fb0f82ba56c05cbc2,
title = "Public land managers and sustainable urban vegetation: The case of low-input turfgrasses",
abstract = "In urban ecosystems, public land managers are responsible for making complex decisions about vegetation and the management of public spaces that have ecological, economic, and social consequences. Across the globe, the question is whether to move from commonly used vegetation options that require multiple inputs (e.g. water, fertilizer, pesticides) and intensive management (e.g. mowing, re-seeding) to more sustainable, low-input, low-management vegetation varieties. Little is known about urban public land managers’ perceptions and beliefs about low-input turfgrass (e.g. fine fescue species) and their willingness to encourage such environmentally sustainable practices for public lands or support low-input vegetation conversion programs for private residential yards in their cities. We surveyed U.S. public land managers in Minnesota and New Jersey metropolitan areas about their preferences and beliefs regarding low-input turfgrass, specifically cool season fine fescue, and related those beliefs to opportunities for urban environmental sustainability. Overall managers showed favorable views towards low-input turfgrasses suggesting an interest in conversion to more sustainable management. Also, they demonstrated significant support of municipal programs to convert both public and private lands to low-input turfgrasses. Educational attainment and employer type were found to be responsible for most differing viewpoints among managers. This study suggests public land managers may not be a barrier to sustainable vegetation change, but rather important facilitators. More work needs to be done to understand this phenomenon globally and evaluate public land managers’ roles in the transition to low-input vegetation as well as capacity to anticipate future challenges for vegetation in the urban ecosystem, more broadly.",
keywords = "Fine fescue, Management, Public land managers, Sustainability, Turfgrass, Urban vegetation",
author = "Barnes, {Michael R.} and Nelson, {Kristen C} and Meyer, {Amanda J.} and Eric Watkins and Bonos, {Stacy A.} and Horgan, {Brian P} and Meyer, {William A.} and James Murphy and Chengyan Yue",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "284--292",
journal = "Urban Forestry and Urban Greening",
issn = "1618-8667",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag GmbH und Co. KG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public land managers and sustainable urban vegetation

T2 - The case of low-input turfgrasses

AU - Barnes, Michael R.

AU - Nelson, Kristen C

AU - Meyer, Amanda J.

AU - Watkins, Eric

AU - Bonos, Stacy A.

AU - Horgan, Brian P

AU - Meyer, William A.

AU - Murphy, James

AU - Yue, Chengyan

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - In urban ecosystems, public land managers are responsible for making complex decisions about vegetation and the management of public spaces that have ecological, economic, and social consequences. Across the globe, the question is whether to move from commonly used vegetation options that require multiple inputs (e.g. water, fertilizer, pesticides) and intensive management (e.g. mowing, re-seeding) to more sustainable, low-input, low-management vegetation varieties. Little is known about urban public land managers’ perceptions and beliefs about low-input turfgrass (e.g. fine fescue species) and their willingness to encourage such environmentally sustainable practices for public lands or support low-input vegetation conversion programs for private residential yards in their cities. We surveyed U.S. public land managers in Minnesota and New Jersey metropolitan areas about their preferences and beliefs regarding low-input turfgrass, specifically cool season fine fescue, and related those beliefs to opportunities for urban environmental sustainability. Overall managers showed favorable views towards low-input turfgrasses suggesting an interest in conversion to more sustainable management. Also, they demonstrated significant support of municipal programs to convert both public and private lands to low-input turfgrasses. Educational attainment and employer type were found to be responsible for most differing viewpoints among managers. This study suggests public land managers may not be a barrier to sustainable vegetation change, but rather important facilitators. More work needs to be done to understand this phenomenon globally and evaluate public land managers’ roles in the transition to low-input vegetation as well as capacity to anticipate future challenges for vegetation in the urban ecosystem, more broadly.

AB - In urban ecosystems, public land managers are responsible for making complex decisions about vegetation and the management of public spaces that have ecological, economic, and social consequences. Across the globe, the question is whether to move from commonly used vegetation options that require multiple inputs (e.g. water, fertilizer, pesticides) and intensive management (e.g. mowing, re-seeding) to more sustainable, low-input, low-management vegetation varieties. Little is known about urban public land managers’ perceptions and beliefs about low-input turfgrass (e.g. fine fescue species) and their willingness to encourage such environmentally sustainable practices for public lands or support low-input vegetation conversion programs for private residential yards in their cities. We surveyed U.S. public land managers in Minnesota and New Jersey metropolitan areas about their preferences and beliefs regarding low-input turfgrass, specifically cool season fine fescue, and related those beliefs to opportunities for urban environmental sustainability. Overall managers showed favorable views towards low-input turfgrasses suggesting an interest in conversion to more sustainable management. Also, they demonstrated significant support of municipal programs to convert both public and private lands to low-input turfgrasses. Educational attainment and employer type were found to be responsible for most differing viewpoints among managers. This study suggests public land managers may not be a barrier to sustainable vegetation change, but rather important facilitators. More work needs to be done to understand this phenomenon globally and evaluate public land managers’ roles in the transition to low-input vegetation as well as capacity to anticipate future challenges for vegetation in the urban ecosystem, more broadly.

KW - Fine fescue

KW - Management

KW - Public land managers

KW - Sustainability

KW - Turfgrass

KW - Urban vegetation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038876376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038876376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85038876376

VL - 29

SP - 284

EP - 292

JO - Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

JF - Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

SN - 1618-8667

ER -