Abstract
Faculty who have been historically excluded from participating in academia present a unique quandary for those who have traditionally held power at the university. This article explores the promotion and tenure (P&T) process of Black faculty using a psychological construct to examine how racial micro-aggressions manifest and articulate themselves through individual and organizational phenomena such as Racial Battle Fatigue (RBF). We applied a psychological approach to narrative inquiry to examine how two faculty of color experienced the P&T process. Participant narratives highlighted how much of the P&T process, and even engagement in academia in general, is articulated by likability or congeniality—two constructs absent from P&T policies.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 890-919 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Journal of Higher Education |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 1 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 by The Ohio State University.
Keywords
- Black faculty
- Promotion and tenure
- Psychological heuristics
- Racial battle fatigue
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Psychological heuristics and faculty of color: Racial battle fatigue and tenure/promotion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS