Proximate and ultimate responses to stress in biological systems

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    53 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Environmental stress causes reductions in survival probability, growth rates and reproductive outputs. Under these circumstances, however, some genotypes may be less influenced by stress than others and these resistant forms will be favoured by stress acting as a selection pressure. Following Mayr (Science, 134: 1501–1506), these two effects can be described as proximate and ultimate respectively. The ultimate, evolutionary response can lead to direct adaptations that are either fixed or facultative, or to indirect life‐history adaptations. Several attempts to classify stressful selection pressures are reviewed and relationships between these are considered. A model that potentially allows proximate and ultimate, direct and indirect adaptations to be treated within the same framework is described. 1989 The Linnean Society

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)173-181
    Number of pages9
    JournalBiological Journal of the Linnean Society
    Volume37
    Issue number1-2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1989

    Fingerprint

    stress response
    reproductive performance
    environmental stress
    genotype
    selection pressure
    effect
    science

    Keywords

    • Proximate
    • facultative responses
    • fixed
    • life‐history adaptation
    • resource‐allocation model
    • ultimate responses

    Cite this

    Proximate and ultimate responses to stress in biological systems. / CALOW, P.

    In: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Vol. 37, No. 1-2, 01.01.1989, p. 173-181.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{ff64785296f34c259fc6603d68c88357,
    title = "Proximate and ultimate responses to stress in biological systems",
    abstract = "Environmental stress causes reductions in survival probability, growth rates and reproductive outputs. Under these circumstances, however, some genotypes may be less influenced by stress than others and these resistant forms will be favoured by stress acting as a selection pressure. Following Mayr (Science, 134: 1501–1506), these two effects can be described as proximate and ultimate respectively. The ultimate, evolutionary response can lead to direct adaptations that are either fixed or facultative, or to indirect life‐history adaptations. Several attempts to classify stressful selection pressures are reviewed and relationships between these are considered. A model that potentially allows proximate and ultimate, direct and indirect adaptations to be treated within the same framework is described. 1989 The Linnean Society",
    keywords = "Proximate, facultative responses, fixed, life‐history adaptation, resource‐allocation model, ultimate responses",
    author = "P. CALOW",
    year = "1989",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1095-8312.1989.tb02101.x",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "37",
    pages = "173--181",
    journal = "Biological Journal of the Linnean Society",
    issn = "0024-4066",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1-2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Proximate and ultimate responses to stress in biological systems

    AU - CALOW, P.

    PY - 1989/1/1

    Y1 - 1989/1/1

    N2 - Environmental stress causes reductions in survival probability, growth rates and reproductive outputs. Under these circumstances, however, some genotypes may be less influenced by stress than others and these resistant forms will be favoured by stress acting as a selection pressure. Following Mayr (Science, 134: 1501–1506), these two effects can be described as proximate and ultimate respectively. The ultimate, evolutionary response can lead to direct adaptations that are either fixed or facultative, or to indirect life‐history adaptations. Several attempts to classify stressful selection pressures are reviewed and relationships between these are considered. A model that potentially allows proximate and ultimate, direct and indirect adaptations to be treated within the same framework is described. 1989 The Linnean Society

    AB - Environmental stress causes reductions in survival probability, growth rates and reproductive outputs. Under these circumstances, however, some genotypes may be less influenced by stress than others and these resistant forms will be favoured by stress acting as a selection pressure. Following Mayr (Science, 134: 1501–1506), these two effects can be described as proximate and ultimate respectively. The ultimate, evolutionary response can lead to direct adaptations that are either fixed or facultative, or to indirect life‐history adaptations. Several attempts to classify stressful selection pressures are reviewed and relationships between these are considered. A model that potentially allows proximate and ultimate, direct and indirect adaptations to be treated within the same framework is described. 1989 The Linnean Society

    KW - Proximate

    KW - facultative responses

    KW - fixed

    KW - life‐history adaptation

    KW - resource‐allocation model

    KW - ultimate responses

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024874964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024874964&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1989.tb02101.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1989.tb02101.x

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0024874964

    VL - 37

    SP - 173

    EP - 181

    JO - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

    JF - Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

    SN - 0024-4066

    IS - 1-2

    ER -