Providing feedback on clinical performance to hospitalists: Experience Using a New Metric Tool to Assess Inpatient Satisfaction With Care From Hospitalists

Haruka Torok, Susrutha Kotwal, Regina Landis, Ugochunkwu Ozumba, Eric Howell, Scott Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Physicians have been shown to possess limited ability for accurate self-assessment; thus, effective feedback is crucial for their professional development. This study describes providers' reflections on their data and evaluates the hospitalist physicians' impressions about receiving this feedback derived from a new survey metric specifically designed to obtain patient assessment of their treating hospitalist provider coupled with reflective sessions. Methods: Participants were 26 hospitalists from one institution. These physicians' data were used for the development and validation of a new metric, Tool to Assess Inpatient Satisfaction with Care from Hospitalists (TAISCH). Participants received a summary of ratings from patients for whom they were the primary provider. This was followed by a 15-minute semistructured telephone interview to discuss the data. Participants then completed an online survey to assess their perceptions about the data and the efficacy of the feedback. Both quantitative and qualitative results were analyzed. Results: All 26 providers reviewed their evaluation data, participated in the discussion of results by phone, and completed the online survey. Most (54%) agreed that TAISCH was superior to Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems in providing hints on how to improve the quality of the care and in providing detailed information about the performance in specific areas (62%). After stratifying hospitalists according to their performance, it was observed that those who scored better responded more favorably to the data. The two main themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis were "reflection on one's performance" and "feedback using TAISCH." Discussion: Most hospitalists in our study felt that TAISCH provided meaningful feedback.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-68
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Association for Hospital Medical Education, and the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Faculty development
  • Reflective practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Providing feedback on clinical performance to hospitalists: Experience Using a New Metric Tool to Assess Inpatient Satisfaction With Care From Hospitalists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this