TY - JOUR
T1 - Provider communication about HPV vaccination
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Gilkey, Melissa B.
AU - McRee, Annie Laurie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2016/6/2
Y1 - 2016/6/2
N2 - Background. Improving HPV vaccination coverage in the US will require healthcare providers to recommend the vaccine more effectively. To inform quality improvement efforts, we systematically reviewed studies of provider communication about HPV vaccination. Methods. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and POPLINE in August 2015 to identify studies of provider communication about HPV vaccination. Results. We identified 101 qualitative and quantitative studies. Providers less often recommended HPV vaccine if they were uncomfortable discussing sex, perceived parents as hesitant, or believed patients to be low risk. Patients less often received recommendations if they were younger, male, or from racial/ethnic minorities. Despite parents' preference for unambiguous recommendations, providers often sent mixed messages by failing to endorse HPV vaccine strongly, differentiating it from other vaccines, and presenting it as an “optional” vaccine that could be delayed. Conclusion. Interventions are needed to help providers deliver effective recommendations in the complex communication environment surrounding HPV vaccination.
AB - Background. Improving HPV vaccination coverage in the US will require healthcare providers to recommend the vaccine more effectively. To inform quality improvement efforts, we systematically reviewed studies of provider communication about HPV vaccination. Methods. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and POPLINE in August 2015 to identify studies of provider communication about HPV vaccination. Results. We identified 101 qualitative and quantitative studies. Providers less often recommended HPV vaccine if they were uncomfortable discussing sex, perceived parents as hesitant, or believed patients to be low risk. Patients less often received recommendations if they were younger, male, or from racial/ethnic minorities. Despite parents' preference for unambiguous recommendations, providers often sent mixed messages by failing to endorse HPV vaccine strongly, differentiating it from other vaccines, and presenting it as an “optional” vaccine that could be delayed. Conclusion. Interventions are needed to help providers deliver effective recommendations in the complex communication environment surrounding HPV vaccination.
KW - adolescent health
KW - health communication
KW - papillomavirus vaccines
KW - physician-patient relations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964078154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964078154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/21645515.2015.1129090
DO - 10.1080/21645515.2015.1129090
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26838681
AN - SCOPUS:84964078154
SN - 2164-5515
VL - 12
SP - 1454
EP - 1468
JO - Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics
JF - Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics
IS - 6
ER -