Abstract
In some cases of proclined maxillary incisors, the proclination can be corrected by a fixed prosthesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the magnitude and distribution of (i) principal stresses in the adjacent alveolar bone and (ii) direct and shear stresses that are normal and parallel, respectively, to the bone-tooth interface of a normal angulated maxillary incisor, a proclined one, and a proclined one corrected with an angled prosthetic crown. 2D finite-element models were constructed, and a static load of 200 N on the palatal surface of the maxillary incisor at different load angles was applied. Load angles (complementary angle to interincisal angle) ranging from 20° to 90° were applied. The results indicate that the load angle could have a more significant impact on the overall stress distributions in the surrounding alveolar bone and along the bone-tooth interface than the proclination of the maxillary incisor. Provided that the resulting interincisal angle is 150° or smaller, the stresses in the surrounding bone and at the bone-tooth interface are similar between a proclined maxillary incisor and the one with prosthodontic correction. Hence, such a correction, when deemed appropriate clinically, can be undertaken with confidence that there is little risk of incurring additional stresses over that already in existence, in the supporting bone and at the tooth-bone interface.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 7416076 |
Journal | Computational and mathematical methods in medicine |
Volume | 2019 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:+e authors would like to acknowledge 3M gives in the provision of financial support to Yiting He with the Key Opinion Leaders Scholarship. +is work was also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
Funding Information:
This work was also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81571015), Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Guangzhou (Grant No. 2017010011), and Science and Technology Plan Funds of Guangdong (2016A050502012).
Funding Information:
China (Grant No. 81571015), Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Guangzhou (Grant No. 2017010011), and Science and Technology Plan Funds of Guangdong (2016A050502012).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Yiting He et al.