TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the family adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale IV
AU - Martínez-Pampliega, Ana
AU - Merino, Laura
AU - Iriarte, Leire
AU - Olson, David H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Psicothema.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Introduction: Building on the expanding cross cultural interest in FACES, the Spanish version of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES IV), aimed at the assessment of the dimensions of cohesion and flexibility of the Circumplex Model, was validated following the author´s guidelines. Method: The sample was composed by 665 college students. Besides, FACES II was also used and family communication, satisfaction, stress and strengths were also measured. Results: The results supported its psychometric adequacy. Construct validity, concurrent and discriminant validity of all the scales were confirmed, maintaining the original structure of the instrument, with 6 scales, 4 Unbalanced scales (Disengaged, Enmeshed, Rigid, and Chaotic), and two Balanced scales (Cohesion and Flexibility). Additionally, the ratio scores confirmed the curvilinearity of the model. Conclusion: All the results supported the adequacy of the Spanish version, which is also promising for use in educational settings, in counseling and in research. Findings with the Spanish version of FACES IV are similar to findings in the United States and other countries.
AB - Introduction: Building on the expanding cross cultural interest in FACES, the Spanish version of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES IV), aimed at the assessment of the dimensions of cohesion and flexibility of the Circumplex Model, was validated following the author´s guidelines. Method: The sample was composed by 665 college students. Besides, FACES II was also used and family communication, satisfaction, stress and strengths were also measured. Results: The results supported its psychometric adequacy. Construct validity, concurrent and discriminant validity of all the scales were confirmed, maintaining the original structure of the instrument, with 6 scales, 4 Unbalanced scales (Disengaged, Enmeshed, Rigid, and Chaotic), and two Balanced scales (Cohesion and Flexibility). Additionally, the ratio scores confirmed the curvilinearity of the model. Conclusion: All the results supported the adequacy of the Spanish version, which is also promising for use in educational settings, in counseling and in research. Findings with the Spanish version of FACES IV are similar to findings in the United States and other countries.
KW - Cohesion
KW - FACES IV
KW - Family functioning
KW - Flexibility
KW - Reliability
KW - Validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023637421&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023637421&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7334/psicothema2016.21
DO - 10.7334/psicothema2016.21
M3 - Article
C2 - 28693716
AN - SCOPUS:85023637421
SN - 0214-9915
VL - 29
SP - 414
EP - 420
JO - Psicothema
JF - Psicothema
IS - 3
ER -