Promoting and scaffolding argumentation through reflective asynchronous discussions

Huann Shyang Lin, Zuway R. Hong, Frances Lawrenz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to explore the impact of asynchronous discussion on the quality and complexity of college students' arguments. Three different cohorts of students registered in a physical science course in 2009 Fall, 2010 Spring.; 2010 Fall semesters were briefly supported with scaffolding in class and then involved in argumentation about socio-scientific issues as take-home assignments. Each cohort was divided into an asynchronous online communication group and a paper-pencil group. The findings showed that very few students' arguments from either group were rated low in quality levels of 1 or 2 on a five-scale level. Additional comparisons revealed that the asynchronous online communication group students slightly outperformed their counterparts in terms of mean quality level of arguments (effect sizes ranged from 0.25 to 0.35) and the frequency of rebuttals. The major finding is that after only one hour of scaffolding followed by the opportunity to practice argumentation at home, students' argumentation skills were slightly better developed through reflective asynchronous online discussions about socio-scientific issues than through paper-pencil practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)378-384
Number of pages7
JournalComputers and Education
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Keywords

  • Computer mediated communication
  • Improving classroom teaching
  • Pedagogical issue
  • Post-secondary education
  • Teaching/learning strategies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Promoting and scaffolding argumentation through reflective asynchronous discussions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this