Prognostic value of premorbid hypertension and neurological status in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Pooled analyses of individual patient data in the SAHIT repository

Blessing N R Jaja, Hester Lingsma, Tom A. Schweizer, Kevin E. Thorpe, Ewout W. Steyerberg, R. Loch Macdonald, Ada Louffat-Olivares, Adam Noble, Andrew Molyneux, Audrey Quinn, Benjamin Lo, Clay Johnston, Daniel Hanggi, David Hasan, George K C Wong, James Torner, Jeff Singh, Julian Spears, Mervyn D I Vergouwen, Michael D. CusimanoMichael Todd, Ming Tseng, Nima Etminan, Peter Le, Stephan Mayer, Thomas Schenk, William Van

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECT The literature has conflicting reports about the prognostic value of premorbid hypertension and neurological status in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of premorbid hypertension and neurological status in the SAH International Trialists repository. METHODS:Patient-level meta-analyses were conducted to investigate univariate associations between premorbid hypertension (6 studies; n = 7249), admission neurological status measured on the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) scale (10 studies; n = 10,869), and 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score. Multivariable analyses were performed to sequentially adjust for the effects of age, CT clot burden, aneurysm location, aneurysm size, and modality of aneurysm repair. Prognostic associations were estimated across the ordered categories of the GOS using proportional odds models. Nagelkerke's R2 statistic was used to quantify the added prognostic value of hypertension and neurological status beyond those of the adjustment factors. RESULTS:Premorbid hypertension was independently associated with poor outcome, with an unadjusted pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50-2.00) and an adjusted OR of 1.38 (95% CI 1.25-1.53). Patients with a premorbid history of hypertension had higher rates of cardiovascular and renal comorbidities, poorer neurological status (p ≤ 0.001), and higher odds of neurological complications including cerebral infarctions, hydrocephalus, rebleeding, and delayed ischemic neurological deficits. Worsening neurological status was strongly independently associated with poor outcome, including WFNS Grades II (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.68-2.03), III (OR 3.85, 95% CI 3.32-4.47), IV (OR 5.58, 95% CI 4.91-6.35), and V (OR 14.18, 95% CI 12.20-16.49). Neurological status had substantial added predictive value greater than the combined value of other prognostic factors (R2 increase > 10%), while the added predictive value of hypertension was marginal (R2 increase < 0.5%). CONCLUSIO NS:This study confirmed the strong prognostic effect of neurological status as measured on the WFNS scale and the independent but weak prognostic effect of premorbid hypertension. The effect of premorbid hypertension could involve multifactorial mechanisms, including an increase in the severity of initial bleeding, the rate of comorbid events, and neurological complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)644-652
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of neurosurgery
Volume122
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© AANS, 2015.

Keywords

  • Hypertension
  • Meta-analysis
  • Neurological status
  • Outcomes
  • Prognostic factors
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Vascular disorders

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic value of premorbid hypertension and neurological status in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Pooled analyses of individual patient data in the SAHIT repository'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this