TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic Factors for Development of Subsequent Metastases in Localized Osteosarcoma
T2 - A Systematic Review and Identification of Literature Gaps
AU - Basile, Patrick
AU - Greengard, Emily
AU - Weigel, Brenda
AU - Spector, Logan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Patrick Basile et al.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Aim. To investigate prognostic factors in pediatric and young adult patients with localized osteosarcoma that could predict the development of subsequent pulmonary metastases and lead to an ability to risk-stratify therapy. We performed a systematic review of the literature published since January 1990 to establish common evidence-based prognostic factors. Methods. PubMed and Embase searches (Jan 1990-Aug 2018) were performed. Two reviewers independently selected papers for patients with localized osteosarcoma with subsequent metastatic development and then reviewed for quality of methods and prognostic factors. Results. Database searches yielded 216 unique results. After screening, 27 full-text articles were studied in depth, with 9 items fulfilling predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Age, tumor location, tumor size/volume, and histologic response carried independent prognostic value in the majority of the studies. Conclusions. Several prognostic factors seemed to be consistent amongst the studies, but the heterogeneity and smaller sizes of the study populations made pooling of results difficult. Standardization of larger patient populations and consistent definitions/cutoffs for prognostic factors are needed to further assess for consistent prognostic factors and potential predictive models to be developed.
AB - Aim. To investigate prognostic factors in pediatric and young adult patients with localized osteosarcoma that could predict the development of subsequent pulmonary metastases and lead to an ability to risk-stratify therapy. We performed a systematic review of the literature published since January 1990 to establish common evidence-based prognostic factors. Methods. PubMed and Embase searches (Jan 1990-Aug 2018) were performed. Two reviewers independently selected papers for patients with localized osteosarcoma with subsequent metastatic development and then reviewed for quality of methods and prognostic factors. Results. Database searches yielded 216 unique results. After screening, 27 full-text articles were studied in depth, with 9 items fulfilling predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Age, tumor location, tumor size/volume, and histologic response carried independent prognostic value in the majority of the studies. Conclusions. Several prognostic factors seemed to be consistent amongst the studies, but the heterogeneity and smaller sizes of the study populations made pooling of results difficult. Standardization of larger patient populations and consistent definitions/cutoffs for prognostic factors are needed to further assess for consistent prognostic factors and potential predictive models to be developed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083107356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083107356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2020/7431549
DO - 10.1155/2020/7431549
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32300279
AN - SCOPUS:85083107356
SN - 1357-714X
VL - 2020
JO - Sarcoma
JF - Sarcoma
M1 - 7431549
ER -