Professional and interprofessional differences in electronic health records use and recognition of safety issues in critically ill patients

Knewton K. Sakata, Laurel S. Stephenson, Ashley Mulanax, Jesse Bierman, Karess Mcgrath, Gretchen Scholl, Adrienne McDougal, David T. Bearden, Vishnu Mohan, Jeffrey A. Gold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations


During interprofessional intensive care unit (ICU) rounds each member of the interprofessional team is responsible for gathering and interpreting information from the electronic health records (EHR) to facilitate effective team decision-making. This study was conducted to determine how each professional group reviews EHR data in preparation for rounds and their ability to identify patient safety issues. Twenty-five physicians, 29 nurses, and 20 pharmacists participated. Individual participants were given verbal and written sign-out and then asked to review a simulated record in our institution’s EHR, which contained 14 patient safety items. After reviewing the chart, subjects presented the patient and the number of safety items recognised was recorded. About 40%, 30%, and 26% of safety issues were recognised by physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, respectively (p = 0.0006) and no item recognised 100% of the time. There was little overlap between the three groups with only 50% of items predicted to be recognised 100% of the time by the team. Differential recognition was associated with marked differences in EHR use, with only 3/152 EHR screens utilised by all three groups and the majority of screens used exclusively only by one group. There were significant and non-overlapping differences in individual profession recognition of patient safety issues in the EHR. Preferential identification of safety issues by certain professional groups may be attributed to differences in EHR use. Future studies will be needed to determine if shared decision-making during rounds can improve recognition of safety issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)636-642
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of interprofessional care
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Taylor & Francis.


  • Communication
  • interprofessional collaboration
  • interprofessional practice
  • quantitative method
  • simulation
  • team effectiveness


Dive into the research topics of 'Professional and interprofessional differences in electronic health records use and recognition of safety issues in critically ill patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this