Proceedings from the ice hockey summit on concussion: A call to action

Aynsley M. Smith, Michael J. Stuart, Richard M. Greenwald, Brian W. Benson, David W. Dodick, Carolyn Emery, Jonathan T. Finnoff, Jason P. Mihalik, William O. Roberts, Carol Anne Sullivan, Willem H. Meeuwisse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


OBJECTIVE: The objective of this proceeding was to integrate the concussion in sport literature and sport science research on safety in ice hockey to develop an action plan to reduce the risk, incidence, severity, and consequences of concussion in ice hockey. DESIGN: A rationale paper outlining a collaborative action plan to address concussions in hockey was posted for review 2 mos before the "Ice Hockey Summit: Action on Concussion." Focused presentations devoted specifically to concussion in ice hockey were presented during the summit, and breakout sessions were used to develop strategies to reduce concussion in the sport. The proceedings and a detailed scientific review (a matrix of solutions) were written to disseminate the evidence-based information and resulting concussion reduction strategies. The manuscripts were reviewed by the authors, advisors, and contributors to ensure that the opinions and recommendations reflect the current level of knowledge on concussion in hockey. RESULTS: Six components of a potential solution were articulated in the "Rationale" paper and became the topics for breakout groups that followed the professional scientific lectures. Topics that formed the core of the action plan were metrics and databases; recognizing, managing, and return to play; hockey equipment and ice arenas; prevention and education; rules and regulations; and expedient communication of the outcomes. The attendees in the breakout sessions identified the action items for each section. The most highly ranked action items were brought to a vote in the open assembly, using an Audience Response System. The strategic planning process was conducted to assess the following: "Where are we at?" "Where must we get to?" "What strategies are necessary to make progress on the prioritized action items?" CONCLUSIONS: Three prioritized action items for each component of the solution and the percentage of the votes received are listed in the body of this proceeding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)694-703
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2011


  • Concussion
  • Hockey


Dive into the research topics of 'Proceedings from the ice hockey summit on concussion: A call to action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this