Procedural Rights in Juvenile Courts: Competence and Consequences

Barry C. Feld

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Scopus citations


This article examines the "law on the books" and the "law in action" in juvenile courts. It analyzes developmental psychological research on juveniles' competence to exercise rights. It also examines the impact of juveniles' limited competence to exercise and waive their right to counsel. Juveniles' developmental limitations adversely affect the delivery of legal services in juvenile courts and increase the risks of erroneous adjudications. Youths' diminished competence and the absence of counsel compounds the risks of erroneous convictions. It then studies the Court's rationale to deny juveniles a constitutional right to a jury trial and analyzes why that makes it easier to convict delinquents than criminals and how the subsequent use of delinquency convictions to enhance criminal sentences compounds that procedural disparity. Finally, the article concludes that most states do not provide delinquents with procedural safeguards that provide formal or functional protections comparable to those of adult criminal defendants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Juvenile Crime and Juvenile Justice
EditorsBarry C. Feld, Donna M. Bishop
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199940776
ISBN (Print)9780195385106
StatePublished - Dec 23 2011

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2012 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.


  • Constitutional right
  • Delinquency
  • Developmental limitations
  • Juvenile courts
  • Legal services
  • Procedural rights


Dive into the research topics of 'Procedural Rights in Juvenile Courts: Competence and Consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this