Problems and pitfalls of the family history positive and negative dichotomy

Response to dalén

Anne Farmer, Peter Mcguffin, Irving I Gottesman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors defend the proposition that the simple division of schizophrenia into family history positive versus family history negative in the hope of uncovering etiological heterogeneity is too naive for a multifactorial disorder as contrasted with rare, mendelizing genetic conditions. Dalén is correct to forecast that a monolithic homogeneity view about the origins of schizophrenia is likely to be refuted and that it is important to pursue such a strategy. Using computed tomographic brain scan results and the simple dichotomy of family history positive versus family history negative as an illustration, we show the weakness (lack of statistical power) of the strategy. The problem arises from the fact that a negative family history for schizophrenia characterizes the vast majority of schizophrenic patients just as it does for insulin-dependent diabetes, another genetically influenced multifactorial disorder. A continuum from more genetic to less genetic variation in the etiology of schizophrenia fits the available familial patterns of risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-370
Number of pages4
JournalSchizophrenia Bulletin
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1990

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Hope
Insulin
Brain

Cite this

Problems and pitfalls of the family history positive and negative dichotomy : Response to dalén. / Farmer, Anne; Mcguffin, Peter; Gottesman, Irving I.

In: Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.12.1990, p. 367-370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farmer, Anne ; Mcguffin, Peter ; Gottesman, Irving I. / Problems and pitfalls of the family history positive and negative dichotomy : Response to dalén. In: Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1990 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 367-370.
@article{ed2e3bae1441420dbf1706118cefc8cd,
title = "Problems and pitfalls of the family history positive and negative dichotomy: Response to dal{\'e}n",
abstract = "The authors defend the proposition that the simple division of schizophrenia into family history positive versus family history negative in the hope of uncovering etiological heterogeneity is too naive for a multifactorial disorder as contrasted with rare, mendelizing genetic conditions. Dal{\'e}n is correct to forecast that a monolithic homogeneity view about the origins of schizophrenia is likely to be refuted and that it is important to pursue such a strategy. Using computed tomographic brain scan results and the simple dichotomy of family history positive versus family history negative as an illustration, we show the weakness (lack of statistical power) of the strategy. The problem arises from the fact that a negative family history for schizophrenia characterizes the vast majority of schizophrenic patients just as it does for insulin-dependent diabetes, another genetically influenced multifactorial disorder. A continuum from more genetic to less genetic variation in the etiology of schizophrenia fits the available familial patterns of risk.",
author = "Anne Farmer and Peter Mcguffin and Gottesman, {Irving I}",
year = "1990",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/schbul/16.3.367",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "367--370",
journal = "Schizophrenia Bulletin",
issn = "0586-7614",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problems and pitfalls of the family history positive and negative dichotomy

T2 - Response to dalén

AU - Farmer, Anne

AU - Mcguffin, Peter

AU - Gottesman, Irving I

PY - 1990/12/1

Y1 - 1990/12/1

N2 - The authors defend the proposition that the simple division of schizophrenia into family history positive versus family history negative in the hope of uncovering etiological heterogeneity is too naive for a multifactorial disorder as contrasted with rare, mendelizing genetic conditions. Dalén is correct to forecast that a monolithic homogeneity view about the origins of schizophrenia is likely to be refuted and that it is important to pursue such a strategy. Using computed tomographic brain scan results and the simple dichotomy of family history positive versus family history negative as an illustration, we show the weakness (lack of statistical power) of the strategy. The problem arises from the fact that a negative family history for schizophrenia characterizes the vast majority of schizophrenic patients just as it does for insulin-dependent diabetes, another genetically influenced multifactorial disorder. A continuum from more genetic to less genetic variation in the etiology of schizophrenia fits the available familial patterns of risk.

AB - The authors defend the proposition that the simple division of schizophrenia into family history positive versus family history negative in the hope of uncovering etiological heterogeneity is too naive for a multifactorial disorder as contrasted with rare, mendelizing genetic conditions. Dalén is correct to forecast that a monolithic homogeneity view about the origins of schizophrenia is likely to be refuted and that it is important to pursue such a strategy. Using computed tomographic brain scan results and the simple dichotomy of family history positive versus family history negative as an illustration, we show the weakness (lack of statistical power) of the strategy. The problem arises from the fact that a negative family history for schizophrenia characterizes the vast majority of schizophrenic patients just as it does for insulin-dependent diabetes, another genetically influenced multifactorial disorder. A continuum from more genetic to less genetic variation in the etiology of schizophrenia fits the available familial patterns of risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025614304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025614304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/schbul/16.3.367

DO - 10.1093/schbul/16.3.367

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 367

EP - 370

JO - Schizophrenia Bulletin

JF - Schizophrenia Bulletin

SN - 0586-7614

IS - 3

ER -