Prime time: Long-term sexual health outcomes of a clinic-linked intervention

Renee E Sieving, Annie-Laurie McRee, Molly Secor-Turner, Ann E Garwick, Linda H. Bearinger, Kara J. Beckman, Barbara J McMorris, Michael D Resnick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Evidence about long-term effects of preventive health services for youth with complex needs is lacking. Prime Time, a youth development intervention, aims to reduce pregnancy risk among vulnerable adolescent females seeking clinic services. Methods: In a randomized trial, 253 sexually active females aged 13-17 who were at high risk for pregnancy were assigned to the Prime Time intervention or usual clinic services. The 18-month intervention, initiated in 2007-2008, comprised regular meetings with case managers and participation in youth leadership groups. Trial participants completed surveys at baseline and 30 months. Regression analyses were used to evaluate differences between groups in sexual and psychosocial outcomes at follow-up. Results: At 30 months, the intervention group reported more months of consistent condom use (adjusted means, 1.8 vs. 1.1) and dual contraceptive use (0.9 vs. 0.3) in the past seven months than did controls. The intervention was most effective in promoting consistent use among participants with relatively high levels of connectedness to family or school. Fifteen percent of intervention participants, but only 6% of controls, reported having abstained from sex in the past six months (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9). Moreover, among high school graduates, those in the intervention group were more likely than those in the control group to have enrolled in college or technical school (72% vs. 37%; odds ratio, 4.5). Conclusion: Health services grounded in a youth development framework can lead to reductions in sexual risk among vulnerable youth that are evident one year following conclusion of services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-100
Number of pages10
JournalPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

prime time
Reproductive Health
health
Group
Preventive Health Services
Odds Ratio
pregnancy
health service
High-Risk Pregnancy
technical school
Condoms
Contraceptive Agents
female adolescent
school graduate
Health Services
contraceptive
Regression Analysis
Pregnancy
Control Groups
manager

Cite this

Prime time : Long-term sexual health outcomes of a clinic-linked intervention. / Sieving, Renee E; McRee, Annie-Laurie; Secor-Turner, Molly; Garwick, Ann E; Bearinger, Linda H.; Beckman, Kara J.; McMorris, Barbara J; Resnick, Michael D.

In: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, Vol. 46, No. 2, 06.2014, p. 91-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3c1e463f819841789ed6654f1331f632,
title = "Prime time: Long-term sexual health outcomes of a clinic-linked intervention",
abstract = "Context: Evidence about long-term effects of preventive health services for youth with complex needs is lacking. Prime Time, a youth development intervention, aims to reduce pregnancy risk among vulnerable adolescent females seeking clinic services. Methods: In a randomized trial, 253 sexually active females aged 13-17 who were at high risk for pregnancy were assigned to the Prime Time intervention or usual clinic services. The 18-month intervention, initiated in 2007-2008, comprised regular meetings with case managers and participation in youth leadership groups. Trial participants completed surveys at baseline and 30 months. Regression analyses were used to evaluate differences between groups in sexual and psychosocial outcomes at follow-up. Results: At 30 months, the intervention group reported more months of consistent condom use (adjusted means, 1.8 vs. 1.1) and dual contraceptive use (0.9 vs. 0.3) in the past seven months than did controls. The intervention was most effective in promoting consistent use among participants with relatively high levels of connectedness to family or school. Fifteen percent of intervention participants, but only 6{\%} of controls, reported having abstained from sex in the past six months (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9). Moreover, among high school graduates, those in the intervention group were more likely than those in the control group to have enrolled in college or technical school (72{\%} vs. 37{\%}; odds ratio, 4.5). Conclusion: Health services grounded in a youth development framework can lead to reductions in sexual risk among vulnerable youth that are evident one year following conclusion of services.",
author = "Sieving, {Renee E} and Annie-Laurie McRee and Molly Secor-Turner and Garwick, {Ann E} and Bearinger, {Linda H.} and Beckman, {Kara J.} and McMorris, {Barbara J} and Resnick, {Michael D}",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1363/46e0914",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "91--100",
journal = "Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health",
issn = "1538-6341",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prime time

T2 - Long-term sexual health outcomes of a clinic-linked intervention

AU - Sieving, Renee E

AU - McRee, Annie-Laurie

AU - Secor-Turner, Molly

AU - Garwick, Ann E

AU - Bearinger, Linda H.

AU - Beckman, Kara J.

AU - McMorris, Barbara J

AU - Resnick, Michael D

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - Context: Evidence about long-term effects of preventive health services for youth with complex needs is lacking. Prime Time, a youth development intervention, aims to reduce pregnancy risk among vulnerable adolescent females seeking clinic services. Methods: In a randomized trial, 253 sexually active females aged 13-17 who were at high risk for pregnancy were assigned to the Prime Time intervention or usual clinic services. The 18-month intervention, initiated in 2007-2008, comprised regular meetings with case managers and participation in youth leadership groups. Trial participants completed surveys at baseline and 30 months. Regression analyses were used to evaluate differences between groups in sexual and psychosocial outcomes at follow-up. Results: At 30 months, the intervention group reported more months of consistent condom use (adjusted means, 1.8 vs. 1.1) and dual contraceptive use (0.9 vs. 0.3) in the past seven months than did controls. The intervention was most effective in promoting consistent use among participants with relatively high levels of connectedness to family or school. Fifteen percent of intervention participants, but only 6% of controls, reported having abstained from sex in the past six months (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9). Moreover, among high school graduates, those in the intervention group were more likely than those in the control group to have enrolled in college or technical school (72% vs. 37%; odds ratio, 4.5). Conclusion: Health services grounded in a youth development framework can lead to reductions in sexual risk among vulnerable youth that are evident one year following conclusion of services.

AB - Context: Evidence about long-term effects of preventive health services for youth with complex needs is lacking. Prime Time, a youth development intervention, aims to reduce pregnancy risk among vulnerable adolescent females seeking clinic services. Methods: In a randomized trial, 253 sexually active females aged 13-17 who were at high risk for pregnancy were assigned to the Prime Time intervention or usual clinic services. The 18-month intervention, initiated in 2007-2008, comprised regular meetings with case managers and participation in youth leadership groups. Trial participants completed surveys at baseline and 30 months. Regression analyses were used to evaluate differences between groups in sexual and psychosocial outcomes at follow-up. Results: At 30 months, the intervention group reported more months of consistent condom use (adjusted means, 1.8 vs. 1.1) and dual contraceptive use (0.9 vs. 0.3) in the past seven months than did controls. The intervention was most effective in promoting consistent use among participants with relatively high levels of connectedness to family or school. Fifteen percent of intervention participants, but only 6% of controls, reported having abstained from sex in the past six months (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9). Moreover, among high school graduates, those in the intervention group were more likely than those in the control group to have enrolled in college or technical school (72% vs. 37%; odds ratio, 4.5). Conclusion: Health services grounded in a youth development framework can lead to reductions in sexual risk among vulnerable youth that are evident one year following conclusion of services.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902374435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902374435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1363/46e0914

DO - 10.1363/46e0914

M3 - Article

C2 - 24650164

AN - SCOPUS:84902374435

VL - 46

SP - 91

EP - 100

JO - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

JF - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

SN - 1538-6341

IS - 2

ER -