Primary commodities and war: Congo-Brazzaville's ambivalent resource curse

Pierre Englebert, James Ron

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    57 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Oil contributed to civil war in the Republic of Congo, but this conflict would never have arisen in the first place had democratization not generated substantial political instability. Once the fighting began, moreover, petroleum's overall effect was ambiguous. Oil tempted elites to fight, but the oil fields' remote location also limited most combat to the capital city. Later, oil money helped underwrite a 1999 peace settlement. Despite polarization among Congo's three main ethnoregional groups, the country did not fracture into ethnic, secessionist, or warlord zones. Thus, Congo qualifies prevailing theories linking natural primary commodities and civil war.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)61-81+126
    JournalComparative Politics
    Volume37
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Primary commodities and war: Congo-Brazzaville's ambivalent resource curse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this