Primacy Effects in Clinical Judgments of Contingency

Shawn P Curley, Mark J. Young, Margaret J. Kingry, J. Frank Yates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In contingency judgment a primacy effect exists when a conclusion about the relationship between clinical variables is inordinately influenced by cases seen earlier rather than later in a presentation sequence. In this study, medical and nursing trainees evidenced this behavior in a hypothetical clinical judgment situation. The behavior was tied to an attention decrement explanation, by which inattention to the later-presented cases leads to inaccurate recall of the relative frequencies of observed cases, which in turn induces a misjudgment of a disease-finding contingency. An explicit intervention based on this hypothesis, forcing attention to later cases by warning that recall of the case frequencies would be required, was effective in reducing primacy effects among medical students. A related, but less explicit, intervention was also tried. This intervention did not significantly reduce primacy effects among nursing students, but was somewhat effective among general undergraduate students performing a non-clinical contingency judgment task.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)216-222
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988

Fingerprint

Nursing Students
Medical Students
Nursing
Students

Keywords

  • clinical judgment
  • decision making
  • diagnosis

Cite this

Primacy Effects in Clinical Judgments of Contingency. / Curley, Shawn P; Young, Mark J.; Kingry, Margaret J.; Yates, J. Frank.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 8, No. 3, 01.01.1988, p. 216-222.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curley, Shawn P ; Young, Mark J. ; Kingry, Margaret J. ; Yates, J. Frank. / Primacy Effects in Clinical Judgments of Contingency. In: Medical Decision Making. 1988 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 216-222.
@article{b5eaa415d5324a87892d6a9e938eb1cf,
title = "Primacy Effects in Clinical Judgments of Contingency",
abstract = "In contingency judgment a primacy effect exists when a conclusion about the relationship between clinical variables is inordinately influenced by cases seen earlier rather than later in a presentation sequence. In this study, medical and nursing trainees evidenced this behavior in a hypothetical clinical judgment situation. The behavior was tied to an attention decrement explanation, by which inattention to the later-presented cases leads to inaccurate recall of the relative frequencies of observed cases, which in turn induces a misjudgment of a disease-finding contingency. An explicit intervention based on this hypothesis, forcing attention to later cases by warning that recall of the case frequencies would be required, was effective in reducing primacy effects among medical students. A related, but less explicit, intervention was also tried. This intervention did not significantly reduce primacy effects among nursing students, but was somewhat effective among general undergraduate students performing a non-clinical contingency judgment task.",
keywords = "clinical judgment, decision making, diagnosis",
author = "Curley, {Shawn P} and Young, {Mark J.} and Kingry, {Margaret J.} and Yates, {J. Frank}",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X8800800310",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "216--222",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primacy Effects in Clinical Judgments of Contingency

AU - Curley, Shawn P

AU - Young, Mark J.

AU - Kingry, Margaret J.

AU - Yates, J. Frank

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - In contingency judgment a primacy effect exists when a conclusion about the relationship between clinical variables is inordinately influenced by cases seen earlier rather than later in a presentation sequence. In this study, medical and nursing trainees evidenced this behavior in a hypothetical clinical judgment situation. The behavior was tied to an attention decrement explanation, by which inattention to the later-presented cases leads to inaccurate recall of the relative frequencies of observed cases, which in turn induces a misjudgment of a disease-finding contingency. An explicit intervention based on this hypothesis, forcing attention to later cases by warning that recall of the case frequencies would be required, was effective in reducing primacy effects among medical students. A related, but less explicit, intervention was also tried. This intervention did not significantly reduce primacy effects among nursing students, but was somewhat effective among general undergraduate students performing a non-clinical contingency judgment task.

AB - In contingency judgment a primacy effect exists when a conclusion about the relationship between clinical variables is inordinately influenced by cases seen earlier rather than later in a presentation sequence. In this study, medical and nursing trainees evidenced this behavior in a hypothetical clinical judgment situation. The behavior was tied to an attention decrement explanation, by which inattention to the later-presented cases leads to inaccurate recall of the relative frequencies of observed cases, which in turn induces a misjudgment of a disease-finding contingency. An explicit intervention based on this hypothesis, forcing attention to later cases by warning that recall of the case frequencies would be required, was effective in reducing primacy effects among medical students. A related, but less explicit, intervention was also tried. This intervention did not significantly reduce primacy effects among nursing students, but was somewhat effective among general undergraduate students performing a non-clinical contingency judgment task.

KW - clinical judgment

KW - decision making

KW - diagnosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023811372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023811372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X8800800310

DO - 10.1177/0272989X8800800310

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 216

EP - 222

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 3

ER -