TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and utility of DSM-IV eating disorder diagnostic criteria among youth
AU - Ackard, Diann M.
AU - Fulkerson, Jayne A.
AU - Neumark-Sztainer, Dianne
PY - 2007/7
Y1 - 2007/7
N2 - Objective: To examine the prevalence and utility of DSM-IV eating disorder (ED) criteria and anorexia (AN), bulimia (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED) among adolescents. Method: An ethnically diverse population-based sample of 4,746 public middle and high school students completed anthropometric measures and Project EAT survey items. Results: Many youth endorsed body shape perception disturbance (41.5% female; 24.9% male), undue influence of body shape/weight on self-esteem (36.4% female; 23.9% male), and compensatory behavior (9.4% female; 13.5% male). Prevalence among females and males, respectively, was: AN = 0.04%, 0%; BN = 0.3%, 0.2%; BED = 1.9%, 0.3%. Analyses of individual criteria showed high sensitivity and negative predictive values for each disorder and corresponding criteria, low specificity for several AN (27.8%) and BN (32.0%) criteria, and low positive predictive values (0.06-40.2%). Conclusion: Body disparagement and compensatory behaviors indicate eating disturbance, despite low prevalence of EDs. Diagnostic classification may be clinically useful, but is complicated for use in epidemiological populations.
AB - Objective: To examine the prevalence and utility of DSM-IV eating disorder (ED) criteria and anorexia (AN), bulimia (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED) among adolescents. Method: An ethnically diverse population-based sample of 4,746 public middle and high school students completed anthropometric measures and Project EAT survey items. Results: Many youth endorsed body shape perception disturbance (41.5% female; 24.9% male), undue influence of body shape/weight on self-esteem (36.4% female; 23.9% male), and compensatory behavior (9.4% female; 13.5% male). Prevalence among females and males, respectively, was: AN = 0.04%, 0%; BN = 0.3%, 0.2%; BED = 1.9%, 0.3%. Analyses of individual criteria showed high sensitivity and negative predictive values for each disorder and corresponding criteria, low specificity for several AN (27.8%) and BN (32.0%) criteria, and low positive predictive values (0.06-40.2%). Conclusion: Body disparagement and compensatory behaviors indicate eating disturbance, despite low prevalence of EDs. Diagnostic classification may be clinically useful, but is complicated for use in epidemiological populations.
KW - Anorexia nervosa
KW - Binge eating disorder
KW - Bulimia nervosa
KW - DSM-IV
KW - Diagnosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250896383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250896383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/eat.20389
DO - 10.1002/eat.20389
M3 - Article
C2 - 17506079
AN - SCOPUS:34250896383
SN - 0276-3478
VL - 40
SP - 409
EP - 417
JO - International Journal of Eating Disorders
JF - International Journal of Eating Disorders
IS - 5
ER -