TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and safety of off-label use of chemotherapeutic agents in older patients with breast cancer
T2 - Estimates from seer-medicare data
AU - Eaton, Anne A.
AU - Sima, Camelia S.
AU - Panageas, Katherine S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Soc. of Petrol. Engineers.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Background: Prescribing drugs outside of the label indication is legal and may reflect standard practice; however, some off-label use may be inappropriate. This study measured the prevalence and safety of off-label use both in accordance with practice guidelines and inconsistent with practice guidelines in older patients with breast cancer. Patients and Methods: The SEER-Medicare data set was used to identify women diagnosed with breast cancer. Intravenous chemotherapy was identified using Medicare claims and classified as either on-label, off-label but included in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Breast Cancer ("off-label/supported"). Or Off-label and Not Included in the NCCN Guidelines . Hospitalization/emergency Dept. Admission Rates Were Compared. Results: A Total of 13,347 Women Were Treated with 16,127 Regimens ; 64% of Regimens Were Off-label/supported, 25% Were On-label, and 11% Were Off-label/unsupported, and Hospitalization/ED Admission Occurred in 27%, 25%, and 32% of Regimens, Respectively . Drugs Never Included in the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer Accounted for 19% of Off-label/unsupported Use . Conclusions: Off-label Use Without Sci. Support Was Not Com., whereas 64% of Use Was Off-label/supported, Reflecting the Fact That Widely Accepted Indications Are Often Not Tested in Registration Trials. Off-label/supported Use Will Likely Increase As More Drugs Are Expected to Have Activ. Across Cancer Sites, and Therefore Understanding the Implications of Such Use Is Critical.
AB - Background: Prescribing drugs outside of the label indication is legal and may reflect standard practice; however, some off-label use may be inappropriate. This study measured the prevalence and safety of off-label use both in accordance with practice guidelines and inconsistent with practice guidelines in older patients with breast cancer. Patients and Methods: The SEER-Medicare data set was used to identify women diagnosed with breast cancer. Intravenous chemotherapy was identified using Medicare claims and classified as either on-label, off-label but included in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Breast Cancer ("off-label/supported"). Or Off-label and Not Included in the NCCN Guidelines . Hospitalization/emergency Dept. Admission Rates Were Compared. Results: A Total of 13,347 Women Were Treated with 16,127 Regimens ; 64% of Regimens Were Off-label/supported, 25% Were On-label, and 11% Were Off-label/unsupported, and Hospitalization/ED Admission Occurred in 27%, 25%, and 32% of Regimens, Respectively . Drugs Never Included in the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer Accounted for 19% of Off-label/unsupported Use . Conclusions: Off-label Use Without Sci. Support Was Not Com., whereas 64% of Use Was Off-label/supported, Reflecting the Fact That Widely Accepted Indications Are Often Not Tested in Registration Trials. Off-label/supported Use Will Likely Increase As More Drugs Are Expected to Have Activ. Across Cancer Sites, and Therefore Understanding the Implications of Such Use Is Critical.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014553046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014553046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0007
DO - 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0007
M3 - Article
C2 - 26733555
AN - SCOPUS:85014553046
SN - 1540-1405
VL - 14
SP - 57
EP - 65
JO - JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
JF - JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
IS - 1
ER -