TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and Molecular Characteristics of Clostridium difficile in Retail Meats, Food-Producing and Companion Animals, and Humans in Minnesota
AU - Shaughnessy, Megan K
AU - Snider, Tim
AU - Sepulveda, Rocio
AU - Boxrud, David
AU - Cebelinski, Elizabeth
AU - Jawahir, Selina
AU - Holzbauer, Stacy
AU - Johnston, Brian D.
AU - Smith, Kirk
AU - Bender, Jeff B.
AU - Thuras, Paul
AU - Diez-Gonzalez, Francisco
AU - Johnson, James R.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Community-associated Clostridium difficile infection (CA-CDI) now accounts for approximately 50% of CDI cases in central Minnesota; animals and meat products are potential sources. From November 2011 to July 2013, we cultured retail meat products and fecal samples from food-producing and companion animals in central Minnesota for C. difficile by using standard methods. The resulting 51 C. difficile isolates, plus 30 archived local veterinary C. difficile isolates and 208 human CA-CDI case isolates from central Minnesota (from 2012) from the Minnesota Department of Health, were characterized molecularly, and source groups were compared using discriminant analysis. C. difficile was recovered from 0 (0%) of 342 retail meat samples and 51 (9%) of 559 animal fecal samples. Overall, the 81 animal source isolates and 208 human source isolates were highly diverse genetically. Molecular traits segregated extensively in relation to animal versus human origin. Discriminant analysis classified 95% of isolates correctly by source group; only five (2.5%) human source isolates were classified as animal source. These data do not support meat products or food-producing and companion animals as important sources of CA-CDI in the central Minnesota study region.
AB - Community-associated Clostridium difficile infection (CA-CDI) now accounts for approximately 50% of CDI cases in central Minnesota; animals and meat products are potential sources. From November 2011 to July 2013, we cultured retail meat products and fecal samples from food-producing and companion animals in central Minnesota for C. difficile by using standard methods. The resulting 51 C. difficile isolates, plus 30 archived local veterinary C. difficile isolates and 208 human CA-CDI case isolates from central Minnesota (from 2012) from the Minnesota Department of Health, were characterized molecularly, and source groups were compared using discriminant analysis. C. difficile was recovered from 0 (0%) of 342 retail meat samples and 51 (9%) of 559 animal fecal samples. Overall, the 81 animal source isolates and 208 human source isolates were highly diverse genetically. Molecular traits segregated extensively in relation to animal versus human origin. Discriminant analysis classified 95% of isolates correctly by source group; only five (2.5%) human source isolates were classified as animal source. These data do not support meat products or food-producing and companion animals as important sources of CA-CDI in the central Minnesota study region.
KW - Clostridium difficile
KW - Food animals
KW - Food safety
KW - Meats
KW - Molecular epidemiology
KW - Surveillance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071580804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071580804&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-104
DO - 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-104
M3 - Article
C2 - 30198756
SN - 0362-028X
VL - 81
SP - 1635
EP - 1642
JO - Journal of food protection
JF - Journal of food protection
IS - 10
ER -