Abstract
Albeit psychologists were granted prescription authority in two states over a decade ago and in three states in recent years, the controversy over prescriptive authority persists within the profession and remains a concern of diverse stakeholders. The literature provides minimal research on the adequacy of psychopharmacology training programs and how commensurate psychologists’ training is with other prescribers’ training. Comparing psychopharmacology training for psychologists to other prescribing professionals’ training reveals psychologists receive fewer didactic training hours in foundational sciences (e.g., biology, chemistry, and pathophysiology) and fewer clinical training hours directly related to prescribing and managing medications. Implications of these findings and legal and regulatory cautions are discussed along with recommendations for future research directions.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | e12309 |
| Journal | Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 American Psychological Association. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the American Psychological Association.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- prescription privileges
- prescriptive authority
- psychologist
- quality of care
- training
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Prescriptive authority: Psychologists’ abridged training relative to other professions’ training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS