TY - JOUR
T1 - Prehospital ultrasound by paramedics
T2 - Results of field trial
AU - Heegaard, William
AU - Hildebrandt, David
AU - Spear, David
AU - Chason, Kevin
AU - Nelson, Bret
AU - Ho, Jeffrey
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2010/6
Y1 - 2010/6
N2 - Objectives: The objective was to determine if 9-1-1 paramedics trained in ultrasound (US) could adequately perform and interpret the Focused Assessment Sonography in Trauma (FAST) and the abdominal aortic (AA) exams in the prehospital care environment. Methods: Paramedics at two emergency medical services (EMS) agencies received a 6-hour training program in US with ongoing refresher education. Paramedics collected US in the field using a prospective convenience methodology. All US were performed in the ambulance without scene delay. US exams were reviewed in a blinded fashion by an emergency sonographer physician overreader (PO). Results: A total of 104 patients had an US performed between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2009. Twenty AA exams were performed and all were interpreted as negative by the paramedics and the PO. Paramedics were unable to obtain adequate images in 7.7% (8/104) of the patients. Eighty-four patients had the FAST exam performed. Six exams (6/84, 7.1%) were read as positive for free intraperitoneal/pericardial fluid by both the paramedics and the PO. FAST and AA US exam interpretation by the paramedics had a 100% proportion of agreement with the PO. Conclusions: This pilot study shows that with close supervision, paramedics can adequately obtain and interpret prehospital FAST and AA US images under protocol. These results support a growing body of literature that indicates US may be feasible and useful in the prehospital setting.
AB - Objectives: The objective was to determine if 9-1-1 paramedics trained in ultrasound (US) could adequately perform and interpret the Focused Assessment Sonography in Trauma (FAST) and the abdominal aortic (AA) exams in the prehospital care environment. Methods: Paramedics at two emergency medical services (EMS) agencies received a 6-hour training program in US with ongoing refresher education. Paramedics collected US in the field using a prospective convenience methodology. All US were performed in the ambulance without scene delay. US exams were reviewed in a blinded fashion by an emergency sonographer physician overreader (PO). Results: A total of 104 patients had an US performed between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2009. Twenty AA exams were performed and all were interpreted as negative by the paramedics and the PO. Paramedics were unable to obtain adequate images in 7.7% (8/104) of the patients. Eighty-four patients had the FAST exam performed. Six exams (6/84, 7.1%) were read as positive for free intraperitoneal/pericardial fluid by both the paramedics and the PO. FAST and AA US exam interpretation by the paramedics had a 100% proportion of agreement with the PO. Conclusions: This pilot study shows that with close supervision, paramedics can adequately obtain and interpret prehospital FAST and AA US images under protocol. These results support a growing body of literature that indicates US may be feasible and useful in the prehospital setting.
KW - Paramedic ultrasound
KW - Prehospital ultrasound
KW - Trauma care
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953587471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953587471&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00755.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00755.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 20491683
AN - SCOPUS:77953587471
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 17
SP - 624
EP - 630
JO - Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 6
ER -