Predictive validity of bulimia nervosa as a diagnostic category

Pamela K. Keel, James E. Mitchell, Kathryn B. Miller, Traci L. Davis, Scott J. Crow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The authors sought to investigate the predictive validity of bulimia nervosa as a diagnostic category. Method: More than 10 years after they appeared as patients with bulimia nervosa, 177 women (participation rate=79.7%) completed follow-up assessments. Results: Among the women with a current eating pathology, most engaged in recurrent binge eating and purging Anorexia nervosa and binge eating disorder were relatively uncommon. Eating disorder outcome was significantly related to the presence of mood, substance use, and impulse control disorders but not to the presence of anxiety disorders Conclusions: These results support the validity of bulimia nervosa as a diagnostic category that is distinct from anorexia nervosa. Furthermore, these results suggest that bulimic symptoms are associated with disorders involving distress and disinhibition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)136-138
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume157
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predictive validity of bulimia nervosa as a diagnostic category'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this