Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predicting mucositis risk associated with cytotoxic cancer treatment regimens: Rationale, complexity, and challenges

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose of review The goals of this review are to describe the complexity of factors influencing the risk of cancer regimen-related mucosal injury (CRRMI), to evaluate the contribution of the innate immune response to CRRMI risk, to compare the concordance of genome analytics in describing mechanism and risk, and to determine if common biological pathways are noted when CRRMI is compared to a disease with a similar phenotype. Recent findings The pathogenesis of and risk for CRRMI are complex and influenced by multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors. It is incumbent on analyses to recognize the likelihood that the interplay and cross-talk of synergistically expressed factors is critical and that the contributing weights of these factors is not uniform from patient to patient. Genomically derived analyses imply final common pathways are implicit in phenotype expression. Summary The identification of specific factors (both genomic and otherwise) which contribute to CRRMI risk represents an important opportunity to apply principles of precision medicine to the management of regimen-related toxicities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)198-210
Number of pages13
JournalCurrent Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • genomics
  • mucositis
  • risk prediction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting mucositis risk associated with cytotoxic cancer treatment regimens: Rationale, complexity, and challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this