Precision vs. realism on the framing continuum: Understanding the underpinnings of message effects

Emily K. Vraga, D. Jasun Carr, Jeffrey P. Nytes, Dhavan V. Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although largely unrecognized, a close reading of extant experimental research on framing effects reveals that contrasting approaches mark the conceptualization and operationalization of message frames in much contemporary inquiry. One approach strives to maintain factual and logical equivalence while altering the vantage point taken in the story, while the other emphasizes different facts, changing the sources, subjects, and scope of a story as part of the frame shift. Exploring the continuum between precision and realism as approaches to framing-between more internally valid and more ecologically valid conceptions of frames-is the focus of this research. An online experimental study contrasted a precise equivalence framing of a social issue in gain and loss terms against a version that included frame-resonant facts, providing the news story more realism. These frames were embedded within a broadcast news report that was scripted, filmed, and produced in conjunction with working television journalists from a PBS affiliate. Results suggest that both more precise and more realistic forms of gain and loss framing deserve continued attention, albeit with careful consideration of what it means "to frame," both conceptually and operationally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalPolitical Communication
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

equivalence
realism
news report
operationalization
social issue
Television
broadcast
journalist
television
news

Keywords

  • Framing
  • Risk perceptions
  • Video processing

Cite this

Precision vs. realism on the framing continuum : Understanding the underpinnings of message effects. / Vraga, Emily K.; Carr, D. Jasun; Nytes, Jeffrey P.; Shah, Dhavan V.

In: Political Communication, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vraga, Emily K. ; Carr, D. Jasun ; Nytes, Jeffrey P. ; Shah, Dhavan V. / Precision vs. realism on the framing continuum : Understanding the underpinnings of message effects. In: Political Communication. 2010 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 1-19.
@article{c41ec30ab4d445e9bffe49ee16c1eaef,
title = "Precision vs. realism on the framing continuum: Understanding the underpinnings of message effects",
abstract = "Although largely unrecognized, a close reading of extant experimental research on framing effects reveals that contrasting approaches mark the conceptualization and operationalization of message frames in much contemporary inquiry. One approach strives to maintain factual and logical equivalence while altering the vantage point taken in the story, while the other emphasizes different facts, changing the sources, subjects, and scope of a story as part of the frame shift. Exploring the continuum between precision and realism as approaches to framing-between more internally valid and more ecologically valid conceptions of frames-is the focus of this research. An online experimental study contrasted a precise equivalence framing of a social issue in gain and loss terms against a version that included frame-resonant facts, providing the news story more realism. These frames were embedded within a broadcast news report that was scripted, filmed, and produced in conjunction with working television journalists from a PBS affiliate. Results suggest that both more precise and more realistic forms of gain and loss framing deserve continued attention, albeit with careful consideration of what it means {"}to frame,{"} both conceptually and operationally.",
keywords = "Framing, Risk perceptions, Video processing",
author = "Vraga, {Emily K.} and Carr, {D. Jasun} and Nytes, {Jeffrey P.} and Shah, {Dhavan V.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10584600903297927",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Political Communication",
issn = "1058-4609",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Precision vs. realism on the framing continuum

T2 - Understanding the underpinnings of message effects

AU - Vraga, Emily K.

AU - Carr, D. Jasun

AU - Nytes, Jeffrey P.

AU - Shah, Dhavan V.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Although largely unrecognized, a close reading of extant experimental research on framing effects reveals that contrasting approaches mark the conceptualization and operationalization of message frames in much contemporary inquiry. One approach strives to maintain factual and logical equivalence while altering the vantage point taken in the story, while the other emphasizes different facts, changing the sources, subjects, and scope of a story as part of the frame shift. Exploring the continuum between precision and realism as approaches to framing-between more internally valid and more ecologically valid conceptions of frames-is the focus of this research. An online experimental study contrasted a precise equivalence framing of a social issue in gain and loss terms against a version that included frame-resonant facts, providing the news story more realism. These frames were embedded within a broadcast news report that was scripted, filmed, and produced in conjunction with working television journalists from a PBS affiliate. Results suggest that both more precise and more realistic forms of gain and loss framing deserve continued attention, albeit with careful consideration of what it means "to frame," both conceptually and operationally.

AB - Although largely unrecognized, a close reading of extant experimental research on framing effects reveals that contrasting approaches mark the conceptualization and operationalization of message frames in much contemporary inquiry. One approach strives to maintain factual and logical equivalence while altering the vantage point taken in the story, while the other emphasizes different facts, changing the sources, subjects, and scope of a story as part of the frame shift. Exploring the continuum between precision and realism as approaches to framing-between more internally valid and more ecologically valid conceptions of frames-is the focus of this research. An online experimental study contrasted a precise equivalence framing of a social issue in gain and loss terms against a version that included frame-resonant facts, providing the news story more realism. These frames were embedded within a broadcast news report that was scripted, filmed, and produced in conjunction with working television journalists from a PBS affiliate. Results suggest that both more precise and more realistic forms of gain and loss framing deserve continued attention, albeit with careful consideration of what it means "to frame," both conceptually and operationally.

KW - Framing

KW - Risk perceptions

KW - Video processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75949094884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75949094884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10584600903297927

DO - 10.1080/10584600903297927

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:75949094884

VL - 27

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Political Communication

JF - Political Communication

SN - 1058-4609

IS - 1

ER -