Pragmatic trials in long-term care: Challenges, opportunities, recommendations

Cari Levy, Sheryl Zimmerman, Vincent Mor, David Gifford, Sherry A. Greenberg, Juliet Holt Klinger, Cathy Lieblich, Sunny Linnebur, Angie McAllister, Arif Nazir, Douglas Pace, Robyn Stone, Barbara Resnick, Philip D. Sloane, Joseph Ouslander, Joseph E. Gaugler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials are considered the most rigorous research design in efficacy and effectiveness research; however, such trials present numerous challenges that limit their applicability in real-world settings. As a consequence, pragmatic trials are increasingly viewed as a research design that overcomes some of these barriers with the potential to produce data that are more reproducible. Although pragmatic methodology in long-term care is receiving increasing attention as an approach to improve successful dissemination and implementation, pragmatic trials present complexities of their own. To address these complexities and related issues, experts with experience conducting pragmatic trials, developing nursing home policy, participating in advocacy efforts, and providing clinical care in long-term care settings participated in a virtual consensus conference funded by the National Institute on Aging in Spring 2021. Participants recommended 4 cross-cutting principles key to dissemination and implementation of pragmatic trial interventions: (1) engage stakeholders, (2) ensure diversity and inclusion, (3) assess organizational strain and readiness, and (4) learn from adaptations. Specifically related to implementation, participants provided 2 recommendations: (1) integrate interventions into existing workflows and (2) maintain agility and responsiveness. Finally, participants had 3 recommendations specific to dissemination: (1) package the message for the audience, (2) engage diverse audiences, and (3) apply dissemination and diffusion tools. Participants emphasized that implementation processes must be grounded in the perspectives of the people who will ultimately be responsible for implementing the intervention once it is proven to be effective. In addition, messaging must speak to long-term care staff and all others who have a stake in its outcomes. Although our understanding of dissemination and implementation strategies remains underdeveloped, this article is designed to guide long-term care researchers and community providers who are increasingly aware of the need for pragmatism in disseminating and implementing evidence-based care interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)282-287
Number of pages6
JournalGeriatric Nursing
Volume44
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) of the National Institutes of Health Award R13 AG067681.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022

Keywords

  • Dissemination
  • Implementation
  • Pragmatic trials
  • Nursing Homes
  • Humans
  • Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Long-Term Care

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pragmatic trials in long-term care: Challenges, opportunities, recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this