Abstract
Purpose: To compare stroke evaluations recommended by retina specialists and neurologists for retinal artery occlusion (RA O). Design: A cross-sectional survey. Methods: An anonymous survey was emailed to members of the American Academy of Neurology Stroke Section listserv and vitreoretinal specialists registered with the American Academy of Ophthalmology. The survey was divided based on duration of symptoms before encounter: less than 12 hours, 24-48 hours, and more than 1 week. Institutional review board approval was obtained before data collection. Results: Four hundred forty-eight surveys were completed (281 retinologists and 167 neurologists). Within 12 hours of RA O, most neurologists (75%) pursue a hospital-based evaluation, whereas the majority of retinologists (82%) pursue outpatient workup (P < 0.0001). Most neurologists (92%) and retinologists (98%) pursue outpatient stroke workup if symptoms have been present for more than 7 days. Conclusions: Neurologists pursue higher acuity care after RA O, whereas most retinologists order outpatient evaluations. Retina specialists should consider urgent stroke evaluation to mitigate stroke risk factors.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 37-39 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2017 by Asia Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Central retinal artery occlusion
- Evaluation
- Management
- Neuroimaging
- Stroke
- Workup
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Practice patterns after acute embolic retinal artery occlusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS