Power concedes nothing without a demand: The case for a patient boycott of U.S. clinical trails

Carl Elliott

doi:10.1002/eahr.402005

Power concedes nothing without a demand: The case for a patient boycott of U.S. clinical trails

Carl Elliott

Philosophy (Twin Cities)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	15-18
Number of pages	4
Journal	IRB Ethics and Human Research
Volume	40
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.402005
State	Published - Mar 1 2018

Publisher link

10.1002/eahr.402005

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{bf973d7f43914a85b9a537fea31a5d63,

title = "Power concedes nothing without a demand: The case for a patient boycott of U.S. clinical trails",

author = "Carl Elliott",

year = "2018",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/eahr.402005",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "40",

pages = "15--18",

journal = "IRB Ethics and Human Research",

issn = "0193-7758",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power concedes nothing without a demand

T2 - The case for a patient boycott of U.S. clinical trails

AU - Elliott, Carl

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85086042195

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85086042195#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1002/eahr.402005

DO - 10.1002/eahr.402005

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85086042195

SN - 0193-7758

VL - 40

SP - 15

EP - 18

JO - IRB Ethics and Human Research

JF - IRB Ethics and Human Research

IS - 2

ER -

Power concedes nothing without a demand: The case for a patient boycott of U.S. clinical trails

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Cite this