Positive, normative and functional schools in law and economics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

During its relatively short history, the law and economics movement has developed three distinct schools of thought. The first two schools of thought, often referred to as the Chicago or positive school and the Yale or normative school, developed almost concurrently. The functional school of law and economics, which developed subsequently, draws from public choice theory and the constitutional perspective of the Virginia school of economics to offer a third perspective which is neither fully positive nor fully normative. Various important methodological questions have accompanied the debate between these schools concerning the appropriate role of economic analysis in the institutional design of lawmaking and the limits of methods of evaluation of social preferences and aggregate welfare in policy analysis. These debates have contributed to the growing intellectual interest in the economic analysis of law.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-272
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Journal of Law and Economics
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2004

Keywords

  • Intellectual history
  • Law and economics
  • Methodology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Positive, normative and functional schools in law and economics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this