Positive interaction of social comparison and personal responsibility for outcomes

Jaroslaw Grygolec, Giorgio Coricelli, Aldo Rustichini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

We formulate and test a model that allows sharp separation between two different ways in which environment affects evaluation of outcomes, by comparing social vs. private and personal responsibility vs. chance. In the experiment, subjects chose between two lotter- ies, one low-risk and one high-risk.They could then observe the outcomes. By varying the environment between private (they could observe the outcome of the chosen lottery and the outcome of the lottery they had not chosen) and social (they could observe the out- come of the lottery chosen by another subject) we can differentiate the response and brain activity following the feedback in social and private settings. The evidence suggests that envy and pride are significant motives driving decisions and outcomes evaluation, stronger than private emotions like regret and rejoice, with ventral striatum playing a key role. When we focus on the outcome evaluation stage we demonstrate that BOLD signal in ventral striatum is increasing in the difference between obtained and counterfactual payoffs. For a given difference in payoffs, striatal responses are more pronounced in social than in private environment. Moreover, a positive interaction (complementarity) between social compari- son and personal responsibility is reflected in the pattern of activity in the ventral striatum. At decision stage we observe getting ahead of the Joneses effect in ventral striatum with subjective value of risk larger in social than in private environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberArticle 25
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume3
Issue numberFEB
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 9 2012

Keywords

  • Envy
  • Pride
  • Regret
  • Responsibility
  • Social comparison

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Positive interaction of social comparison and personal responsibility for outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this