Population-level impacts of pesticide-induced chronic effects on individuals depend more on ecology than toxicology

T. Dalkvist, C. J. Topping, V. E. Forbes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations


The current method for assessing long-term risk of pesticides to mammals in the EU is based on the individual rather than the population-level and lacks ecological realism. Hence there is little possibility for regulatory authorities to increase ecological realism and understanding of risks at the population-level. Here we demonstrate how, using ABM modelling, assessments at the population-level can be obtained even for a pesticide with complex long-term effects such as epigenetic transmission of reproductive depression. By objectively fitting nonlinear models to the simulation outputs it was possible to compare population depression and recovery rates for a range of scenarios in which toxicity and exposure factors were varied. The system was differentially sensitive to the various factors, but vole ecology and behaviour were at least as important predictors of population-level effects as toxicology. This emphasises the need for greater focus on animal ecology in risk assessments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1663-1672
Number of pages10
JournalEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Issue number6
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research has been sponsored by the Danish Natural Science Research Council. Thanks to Jacob Nabe-Nielsen, Richard Sibly, and Thomas Kragh for statistical and mathematical assistance, and to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.


  • ABM
  • ALMaSS
  • Ecotoxicology
  • IBM
  • Long-term
  • Microtus agrestis
  • Pesticide
  • Risk assessment
  • Vinclozolin


Dive into the research topics of 'Population-level impacts of pesticide-induced chronic effects on individuals depend more on ecology than toxicology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this