Pollinator size and its consequences

Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects

Liam K. Kendall, Romina Rader, Vesna Gagic, Daniel P Cariveau, Matthias Albrecht, Katherine C.R. Baldock, Breno M. Freitas, Mark Hall, Andrea Holzschuh, Francisco P. Molina, Joanne M. Morten, Janaely S. Pereira, Zachary M. Portman, Stuart P.M. Roberts, Juanita Rodriguez, Laura Russo, Louis Sutter, Nicolas J. Vereecken, Ignasi Bartomeus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Body size is an integral functional trait that underlies pollination-related ecological processes, yet it is often impractical to measure directly. Allometric scaling laws have been used to overcome this problem. However, most existing models rely upon small sample sizes, geographically restricted sampling and have limited applicability for non-bee taxa. Allometric models that consider biogeography, phylogenetic relatedness, and intraspecific variation are urgently required to ensure greater accuracy. We measured body size as dry weight and intertegular distance (ITD) of 391 bee species (4,035 specimens) and 103 hoverfly species (399 specimens) across four biogeographic regions: Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. We updated existing models within a Bayesian mixed-model framework to test the power of ITD to predict interspecific variation in pollinator dry weight in interaction with different co-variates: phylogeny or taxonomy, sexual dimorphism, and biogeographic region. In addition, we used ordinary least squares regression to assess intraspecific dry weight ~ ITD relationships for ten bees and five hoverfly species. Including co-variates led to more robust interspecific body size predictions for both bees and hoverflies relative to models with the ITD alone. In contrast, at the intraspecific level, our results demonstrate that the ITD is an inconsistent predictor of body size for bees and hoverflies. The use of allometric scaling laws to estimate body size is more suitable for interspecific comparative analyses than assessing intraspecific variation. Collectively, these models form the basis of the dynamic R package, “pollimetry,” which provides a comprehensive resource for allometric pollination research worldwide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1702-1714
Number of pages13
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

insects
bees
estimates
scaling laws
taxonomy
predictions
regression analysis
resources
sampling
interactions

Keywords

  • Apoidea
  • R package
  • Syrphidae
  • biogeography
  • body size
  • dry weight
  • pollimetry
  • pollination
  • predictive models

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Cite this

Kendall, L. K., Rader, R., Gagic, V., Cariveau, D. P., Albrecht, M., Baldock, K. C. R., ... Bartomeus, I. (2019). Pollinator size and its consequences: Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects. Ecology and Evolution, 9(4), 1702-1714. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4835

Pollinator size and its consequences : Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects. / Kendall, Liam K.; Rader, Romina; Gagic, Vesna; Cariveau, Daniel P; Albrecht, Matthias; Baldock, Katherine C.R.; Freitas, Breno M.; Hall, Mark; Holzschuh, Andrea; Molina, Francisco P.; Morten, Joanne M.; Pereira, Janaely S.; Portman, Zachary M.; Roberts, Stuart P.M.; Rodriguez, Juanita; Russo, Laura; Sutter, Louis; Vereecken, Nicolas J.; Bartomeus, Ignasi.

In: Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.02.2019, p. 1702-1714.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kendall, LK, Rader, R, Gagic, V, Cariveau, DP, Albrecht, M, Baldock, KCR, Freitas, BM, Hall, M, Holzschuh, A, Molina, FP, Morten, JM, Pereira, JS, Portman, ZM, Roberts, SPM, Rodriguez, J, Russo, L, Sutter, L, Vereecken, NJ & Bartomeus, I 2019, 'Pollinator size and its consequences: Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects', Ecology and Evolution, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1702-1714. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4835
Kendall, Liam K. ; Rader, Romina ; Gagic, Vesna ; Cariveau, Daniel P ; Albrecht, Matthias ; Baldock, Katherine C.R. ; Freitas, Breno M. ; Hall, Mark ; Holzschuh, Andrea ; Molina, Francisco P. ; Morten, Joanne M. ; Pereira, Janaely S. ; Portman, Zachary M. ; Roberts, Stuart P.M. ; Rodriguez, Juanita ; Russo, Laura ; Sutter, Louis ; Vereecken, Nicolas J. ; Bartomeus, Ignasi. / Pollinator size and its consequences : Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects. In: Ecology and Evolution. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 1702-1714.
@article{87cb5a2524bc425d961f73eefcb3d176,
title = "Pollinator size and its consequences: Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects",
abstract = "Body size is an integral functional trait that underlies pollination-related ecological processes, yet it is often impractical to measure directly. Allometric scaling laws have been used to overcome this problem. However, most existing models rely upon small sample sizes, geographically restricted sampling and have limited applicability for non-bee taxa. Allometric models that consider biogeography, phylogenetic relatedness, and intraspecific variation are urgently required to ensure greater accuracy. We measured body size as dry weight and intertegular distance (ITD) of 391 bee species (4,035 specimens) and 103 hoverfly species (399 specimens) across four biogeographic regions: Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. We updated existing models within a Bayesian mixed-model framework to test the power of ITD to predict interspecific variation in pollinator dry weight in interaction with different co-variates: phylogeny or taxonomy, sexual dimorphism, and biogeographic region. In addition, we used ordinary least squares regression to assess intraspecific dry weight ~ ITD relationships for ten bees and five hoverfly species. Including co-variates led to more robust interspecific body size predictions for both bees and hoverflies relative to models with the ITD alone. In contrast, at the intraspecific level, our results demonstrate that the ITD is an inconsistent predictor of body size for bees and hoverflies. The use of allometric scaling laws to estimate body size is more suitable for interspecific comparative analyses than assessing intraspecific variation. Collectively, these models form the basis of the dynamic R package, “pollimetry,” which provides a comprehensive resource for allometric pollination research worldwide.",
keywords = "Apoidea, R package, Syrphidae, biogeography, body size, dry weight, pollimetry, pollination, predictive models",
author = "Kendall, {Liam K.} and Romina Rader and Vesna Gagic and Cariveau, {Daniel P} and Matthias Albrecht and Baldock, {Katherine C.R.} and Freitas, {Breno M.} and Mark Hall and Andrea Holzschuh and Molina, {Francisco P.} and Morten, {Joanne M.} and Pereira, {Janaely S.} and Portman, {Zachary M.} and Roberts, {Stuart P.M.} and Juanita Rodriguez and Laura Russo and Louis Sutter and Vereecken, {Nicolas J.} and Ignasi Bartomeus",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ece3.4835",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1702--1714",
journal = "Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2045-7758",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pollinator size and its consequences

T2 - Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects

AU - Kendall, Liam K.

AU - Rader, Romina

AU - Gagic, Vesna

AU - Cariveau, Daniel P

AU - Albrecht, Matthias

AU - Baldock, Katherine C.R.

AU - Freitas, Breno M.

AU - Hall, Mark

AU - Holzschuh, Andrea

AU - Molina, Francisco P.

AU - Morten, Joanne M.

AU - Pereira, Janaely S.

AU - Portman, Zachary M.

AU - Roberts, Stuart P.M.

AU - Rodriguez, Juanita

AU - Russo, Laura

AU - Sutter, Louis

AU - Vereecken, Nicolas J.

AU - Bartomeus, Ignasi

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Body size is an integral functional trait that underlies pollination-related ecological processes, yet it is often impractical to measure directly. Allometric scaling laws have been used to overcome this problem. However, most existing models rely upon small sample sizes, geographically restricted sampling and have limited applicability for non-bee taxa. Allometric models that consider biogeography, phylogenetic relatedness, and intraspecific variation are urgently required to ensure greater accuracy. We measured body size as dry weight and intertegular distance (ITD) of 391 bee species (4,035 specimens) and 103 hoverfly species (399 specimens) across four biogeographic regions: Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. We updated existing models within a Bayesian mixed-model framework to test the power of ITD to predict interspecific variation in pollinator dry weight in interaction with different co-variates: phylogeny or taxonomy, sexual dimorphism, and biogeographic region. In addition, we used ordinary least squares regression to assess intraspecific dry weight ~ ITD relationships for ten bees and five hoverfly species. Including co-variates led to more robust interspecific body size predictions for both bees and hoverflies relative to models with the ITD alone. In contrast, at the intraspecific level, our results demonstrate that the ITD is an inconsistent predictor of body size for bees and hoverflies. The use of allometric scaling laws to estimate body size is more suitable for interspecific comparative analyses than assessing intraspecific variation. Collectively, these models form the basis of the dynamic R package, “pollimetry,” which provides a comprehensive resource for allometric pollination research worldwide.

AB - Body size is an integral functional trait that underlies pollination-related ecological processes, yet it is often impractical to measure directly. Allometric scaling laws have been used to overcome this problem. However, most existing models rely upon small sample sizes, geographically restricted sampling and have limited applicability for non-bee taxa. Allometric models that consider biogeography, phylogenetic relatedness, and intraspecific variation are urgently required to ensure greater accuracy. We measured body size as dry weight and intertegular distance (ITD) of 391 bee species (4,035 specimens) and 103 hoverfly species (399 specimens) across four biogeographic regions: Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. We updated existing models within a Bayesian mixed-model framework to test the power of ITD to predict interspecific variation in pollinator dry weight in interaction with different co-variates: phylogeny or taxonomy, sexual dimorphism, and biogeographic region. In addition, we used ordinary least squares regression to assess intraspecific dry weight ~ ITD relationships for ten bees and five hoverfly species. Including co-variates led to more robust interspecific body size predictions for both bees and hoverflies relative to models with the ITD alone. In contrast, at the intraspecific level, our results demonstrate that the ITD is an inconsistent predictor of body size for bees and hoverflies. The use of allometric scaling laws to estimate body size is more suitable for interspecific comparative analyses than assessing intraspecific variation. Collectively, these models form the basis of the dynamic R package, “pollimetry,” which provides a comprehensive resource for allometric pollination research worldwide.

KW - Apoidea

KW - R package

KW - Syrphidae

KW - biogeography

KW - body size

KW - dry weight

KW - pollimetry

KW - pollination

KW - predictive models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062097856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062097856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ece3.4835

DO - 10.1002/ece3.4835

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1702

EP - 1714

JO - Ecology and Evolution

JF - Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2045-7758

IS - 4

ER -