Plant allocation and the multiple limitation hypothesis

S. K. Gleeson, D. Tilman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

168 Scopus citations


Although optimal foraging theory applied to plant expenditure on resource uptake predicts that plant morphology and physiology should be adjusted to make all resources simultaneously limiting, two considerations make it unlikely that resource enrichment experiments will show strong responses to all nutrient additions. 1) Growth response to enrichment is strongly dependent on costs and demand, and detectable growth responses are only likely for "expensive' resources in high demand. 2) Many resources are acquired simultaneously as a result of allocation to a single structure (eg various soil resources obtained by roots). This can cause the growth of an optimally foraging plant to be limited by a single resource. Altering the model to allow for more than one allocation currency (such as N and C) has the effect of making plant composition (and therefore demand) dependent on the supply rates of resouces. This assumption can sometimes qualitatively change the above predictions. In addition to supply and demand, the pattern of signs (positive or negative) of net correlation in uptake allocation will control the pattern of multiple limitation. -from Authors

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1322-1343
Number of pages22
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992


Dive into the research topics of 'Plant allocation and the multiple limitation hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this