TY - JOUR
T1 - Planning for success
T2 - Serengeti lions seek prey accessibility rather than abundance
AU - Grant, J.
AU - Hopcraft, C.
AU - Sinclair, A. R.E.
AU - Packer, Craig
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005/5
Y1 - 2005/5
N2 - 1. We used long-term radio-telemetry data to investigate how Serengeti lions (Panthera leo) distribute themselves with respect to hunting opportunities. Specifically, we investigate whether lions hunt in areas where prey are easy to capture or where prey are locally abundant. 2. We used resource-selection functions (logistic regressions) to measure the location of kills/carcasses with respect to five different habitats: the view-sheds from large rocky outcrops, river confluences, woodland vegetation, erosion embankments and water sources. 3. As expected for a sit-and-wait predator, resting lions spent more time in areas with good cover. On a broad-scale, lions shifted their ranges according to the seasonal movement of prey, but at a finer scale (< 100 m) lions fed in areas with high prey 'catchability' rather than high prey density. Plains lions selected erosion embankments, view-sheds from rocky outcrops, and access to free water. Woodland lions tended to use erosion embankments, and woody vegetation. 4. The results emphasize the importance of fine-scale landscape and habitat features when assessing predator-prey theory and conservation.
AB - 1. We used long-term radio-telemetry data to investigate how Serengeti lions (Panthera leo) distribute themselves with respect to hunting opportunities. Specifically, we investigate whether lions hunt in areas where prey are easy to capture or where prey are locally abundant. 2. We used resource-selection functions (logistic regressions) to measure the location of kills/carcasses with respect to five different habitats: the view-sheds from large rocky outcrops, river confluences, woodland vegetation, erosion embankments and water sources. 3. As expected for a sit-and-wait predator, resting lions spent more time in areas with good cover. On a broad-scale, lions shifted their ranges according to the seasonal movement of prey, but at a finer scale (< 100 m) lions fed in areas with high prey 'catchability' rather than high prey density. Plains lions selected erosion embankments, view-sheds from rocky outcrops, and access to free water. Woodland lions tended to use erosion embankments, and woody vegetation. 4. The results emphasize the importance of fine-scale landscape and habitat features when assessing predator-prey theory and conservation.
KW - Ambush predator
KW - Habitat selection
KW - Predator-prey interaction
KW - Predator-sensitive foraging
KW - Prey abundance
KW - Resource selection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20044368637&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20044368637&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00955.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00955.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:20044368637
SN - 0021-8790
VL - 74
SP - 559
EP - 566
JO - Journal of Animal Ecology
JF - Journal of Animal Ecology
IS - 3
ER -