TY - JOUR
T1 - “Pitching” posttraumatic stress disorder treatment
T2 - A qualitative study of how providers discuss evidence-based psychotherapies with patients
AU - Hooyer, Katinka
AU - Hamblen, Jessica
AU - Kehle-Forbes, Shannon M.
AU - Larsen, Sadie E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ([0-9]+) International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - The two widely available evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure. Although the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has invested in intensive clinical training to provide these first-line treatments, most military veterans do not receive these therapies. Prior research indicates that patient interest and motivation depend on how patients are educated, and differences in how information is presented shape their decision-making. To our knowledge, no studies have addressed how clinicians “pitch” EBPs for PTSD and examined whether certain approaches are more effective than others. We recorded and thematically analyzed 25 treatment planning sessions across 10 VA sites in the United States to better understand how providers talk to patients about treatment options. Five themes were identified: using rich description, integrating various forms of questioning to engage the patient, sharing prior patient success stories, using inviting and direct language, and tailoring therapy talk to fit patient needs. Providers learning to offer EBPs can use these strategies to serve as a “menu” of options that will allow them to present EBPs in a way that appeals to a particular patient.
AB - The two widely available evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure. Although the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has invested in intensive clinical training to provide these first-line treatments, most military veterans do not receive these therapies. Prior research indicates that patient interest and motivation depend on how patients are educated, and differences in how information is presented shape their decision-making. To our knowledge, no studies have addressed how clinicians “pitch” EBPs for PTSD and examined whether certain approaches are more effective than others. We recorded and thematically analyzed 25 treatment planning sessions across 10 VA sites in the United States to better understand how providers talk to patients about treatment options. Five themes were identified: using rich description, integrating various forms of questioning to engage the patient, sharing prior patient success stories, using inviting and direct language, and tailoring therapy talk to fit patient needs. Providers learning to offer EBPs can use these strategies to serve as a “menu” of options that will allow them to present EBPs in a way that appeals to a particular patient.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85194825798
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85194825798#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1002/jts.23058
DO - 10.1002/jts.23058
M3 - Article
C2 - 38812334
AN - SCOPUS:85194825798
SN - 0894-9867
VL - 37
SP - 901
EP - 912
JO - Journal of Traumatic Stress
JF - Journal of Traumatic Stress
IS - 6
ER -