Physics implications of the diphoton excess from the perspective of renormalization group flow

Jiayin Gu, Zhen Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

A very plausible explanation for the recently observed diphoton excess at the 13 TeV LHC is a (pseudo)scalar with mass around 750 GeV, which couples to a gluon pair and to a photon pair through loops involving vectorlike quarks (VLQs). To accommodate the observed rate, the required Yukawa couplings tend to be large. A large Yukawa coupling would rapidly run up with the scale and quickly reach the perturbativity bound, indicating that new physics, possibly with a strong dynamics origin, is nearby. The case becomes stronger especially if the ATLAS observation of a large width persists. In this paper we study the implication on the scale of new physics from the 750 GeV diphoton excess using the method of renormalization group running with careful treatment of different contributions and perturbativity criterion. Our results suggest that the scale of new physics is generically not much larger than the TeV scale, in particular if the width of the hinted (pseudo)scalar is large. Introducing multiple copies of VLQs, lowering the VLQ masses, and enlarging VLQ electric charges help reduce the required Yukawa couplings and can push the cutoff scale to higher values. Nevertheless, if the width of the 750 GeV resonance turns out to be larger than about 1 GeV, it is very hard to increase the cutoff scale beyond a few TeVs. This is a strong hint that new particles in addition to the 750 GeV resonance and the vectorlike quarks should be around the TeV scale.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number075006
JournalPhysical Review D
Volume93
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 6 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Physical Society.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physics implications of the diphoton excess from the perspective of renormalization group flow'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this