TY - JOUR
T1 - Photosynthesis response of ‘carolina’ cucumber to simulated and actual striped cucumber beetle (coleoptera: Chrysomeli-dae) defoliation*
AU - Burkness, Eric C.
AU - Hutchison, William D.
AU - Higley, Leon G.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1999/3
Y1 - 1999/3
N2 - Abstract Field studies were conducted in 1995 to compare the photosynthesis response between simulated striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittatum (F.), defoliation and actual A. vittatum defoliation in ‘Carolina’ cucumber. Six simulated defoliation levels (0%–100%)were used over 5 timings of defoliation (first true leaf to harvest). Plots were defoliated with scissors twice each week throughout each timing interval, and defined as continuous defoliation. In addition to continuous defoliation, one-time simulated defoliation treatments were imposed using the same timing treatments but only 4 defoliation levels (0, 25, 50, and 100%). Two cage studies, with A. vittatum adults, were used to provide estimates of actual insect defoliation injury. Beetles were placed in cages for 2 weeks at densities of 0, 1, 3, 5, and 10/plant and net photosynthetic rates were measured. No significant differences (P <0. 05 were detected in pho-tosynthetic rates between simulated and actual insect defoliation treatments. Also, few significant differences in photosynthetic rates were detected between damaged and undamaged leaves in the simulated insect defoliation study. Results indicated that the simulated insect defoliation procedure appeared to accurately reflect the growth response of ‘Carolina’ cucumber subjected to actual A. vittatum defoliation, and that simulated defoliation results should be appropriate for developing economic injury levels for A. vittatum on cucumber.
AB - Abstract Field studies were conducted in 1995 to compare the photosynthesis response between simulated striped cucumber beetle, Acalymma vittatum (F.), defoliation and actual A. vittatum defoliation in ‘Carolina’ cucumber. Six simulated defoliation levels (0%–100%)were used over 5 timings of defoliation (first true leaf to harvest). Plots were defoliated with scissors twice each week throughout each timing interval, and defined as continuous defoliation. In addition to continuous defoliation, one-time simulated defoliation treatments were imposed using the same timing treatments but only 4 defoliation levels (0, 25, 50, and 100%). Two cage studies, with A. vittatum adults, were used to provide estimates of actual insect defoliation injury. Beetles were placed in cages for 2 weeks at densities of 0, 1, 3, 5, and 10/plant and net photosynthetic rates were measured. No significant differences (P <0. 05 were detected in pho-tosynthetic rates between simulated and actual insect defoliation treatments. Also, few significant differences in photosynthetic rates were detected between damaged and undamaged leaves in the simulated insect defoliation study. Results indicated that the simulated insect defoliation procedure appeared to accurately reflect the growth response of ‘Carolina’ cucumber subjected to actual A. vittatum defoliation, and that simulated defoliation results should be appropriate for developing economic injury levels for A. vittatum on cucumber.
KW - Acalymma vittatum
KW - Chrysomelidae
KW - Coleoptera
KW - Integrated pest management
KW - Photosynthesis
KW - Simulated insect injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942488836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1942488836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1744-7917.1999.tb00007.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1744-7917.1999.tb00007.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:1942488836
SN - 1672-9609
VL - 6
SP - 29
EP - 38
JO - Insect Science
JF - Insect Science
IS - 1
ER -