Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Phosphorus lability across diverse agricultural contexts with legacy sources

  • Zachary P. Simpson
  • , Joshua Mott
  • , Kyle Elkin
  • , Anthony Buda
  • , Joshua Faulkner
  • , Cathleen Hapeman
  • , Greg McCarty
  • , Maryam Foroughi
  • , W. Dean Hively
  • , Kevin King
  • , Will Osterholz
  • , Chad Penn
  • , Mark Williams
  • , Lindsey Witthaus
  • , Martin Locke
  • , Ethan Pawlowski
  • , Brent Dalzell
  • , Gary Feyereisen
  • , Christine Dolph
  • , David Bjorneberg
  • Kossi Nouwakpo, Christopher W. Rogers, Isis Scott, Carl H. Bolster, Lisa Duriancik, Peter J.A. Kleinman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The buffering of phosphorus (P) in the landscape delays management outcomes for water quality. If stored in labile form (readily exchangeable and bioavailable), P may readily pollute waters. We studied labile P and its intensity for >600 soils and sediments across seven study locations in the United States. Stocks of labile P were large enough to sustain high P losses for decades, indicating the transport-limited regime typical of legacy P. Sediments were commonly more P-sorptive than nearby soils. Soils in the top 5 cm had 1.3–3.0 times more labile P than soils at 5–15 cm. Stratification in soil test P and total P was, however, less consistent. As P exchange via sorption processes follows the difference in intensities between soil/sediment surface and solution, we built a model for the equilibrium phosphate concentration at net zero sorption (EPC0) as a function of labile P (quantity) and buffer capacity. Despite widely varying properties across sites, the model generalized well for all soils and sediments: EPC0 increased sharply with more labile P and to greater degree when buffer capacity was low or sorption sites were likely more saturated. This quantity–intensity–capacity relationship is central to the P transport models we rely on today. Our data inform the improvement of such P models, which will be necessary to predict the impacts of legacy P. Further, this work reaffirms the position of labile P as a key focus for environmental P management—a view Dr. Sharpley developed in the 1980s with fewer data and resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)851-869
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Environmental Quality
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Environmental Quality published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phosphorus lability across diverse agricultural contexts with legacy sources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this