Abstract
Summary points • New terminology, persistent dento-alveolar pain disorder (PDAP), and diagnostic criteria have been put forward to address the shortcomings of existing nomenclature, which are associated with unclear criteria. • Arriving at an accurate diagnosis of PDAP is based on excluding other possible aetiologies, and may involve different care providers. • Synthesis of published data suggests that PDAP has a frequency of occurrence following root canal therapy of around 1.6%. • The putative risk factors involved in PDAP are largely unknown, but seem to be similar to those being identified with other post-surgical chronic pain disorders. • The underlying mechanisms involved in the development of and/or perpetuating PDAP are unknown and the approach to treatment remains empiric in nature.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 18-25 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Reviews in Pain |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Non-odontogenic tooth pain, chronic tooth pain, atypical odontalgia, phantom tooth pain, review, diagnosis, epidemiology, mechanisms