Performance of Public–Private Partnerships and the Influence of Contractual Arrangements

Yin Wang, Zhirong J Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article seeks to answer two research questions: does public-private partnerships (ppp) live up to its promises to government? How do contractual arrangements affect ppp performance? We propose a conceptual framework to evaluate ppp performance by comparing actual project outcomes to government goals in initiating the partnerships, and to explore how a set of contractual arrangements affect the ppp performance on each identified goal. The framework is applied to a comparative case analysis of highway ppp experiences in the commonwealth of virginia (us) since the 1990s. The results show that these ppp cases were successful in accessing innovative finance, but their performance was mixed on reducing construction risk and transferring revenue risk. Generally improved over time with later projects, the ppp performance was affected not only by interaction among contractual arrangements –private partner selection, financial arrangements, role division, risk allocation, and project characteristics–but also by authorizing and supportive legislation in the policy domain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)177-200
Number of pages24
JournalPublic Performance and Management Review
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2018

Fingerprint

public private partnership
performance
Public-private partnerships
revenue
finance
legislation
interaction
experience

Keywords

  • contractual arrangements
  • highway development
  • performance evaluation
  • public-private partnerships

Cite this

Performance of Public–Private Partnerships and the Influence of Contractual Arrangements. / Wang, Yin; Zhao, Zhirong J.

In: Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 41, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 177-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e2cc2e6b60144a31a42458640038dbf9,
title = "Performance of Public–Private Partnerships and the Influence of Contractual Arrangements",
abstract = "This article seeks to answer two research questions: does public-private partnerships (ppp) live up to its promises to government? How do contractual arrangements affect ppp performance? We propose a conceptual framework to evaluate ppp performance by comparing actual project outcomes to government goals in initiating the partnerships, and to explore how a set of contractual arrangements affect the ppp performance on each identified goal. The framework is applied to a comparative case analysis of highway ppp experiences in the commonwealth of virginia (us) since the 1990s. The results show that these ppp cases were successful in accessing innovative finance, but their performance was mixed on reducing construction risk and transferring revenue risk. Generally improved over time with later projects, the ppp performance was affected not only by interaction among contractual arrangements –private partner selection, financial arrangements, role division, risk allocation, and project characteristics–but also by authorizing and supportive legislation in the policy domain.",
keywords = "contractual arrangements, highway development, performance evaluation, public-private partnerships",
author = "Yin Wang and Zhao, {Zhirong J}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/15309576.2017.1400989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "177--200",
journal = "Public Performance & Management Review",
issn = "1530-9576",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of Public–Private Partnerships and the Influence of Contractual Arrangements

AU - Wang, Yin

AU - Zhao, Zhirong J

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - This article seeks to answer two research questions: does public-private partnerships (ppp) live up to its promises to government? How do contractual arrangements affect ppp performance? We propose a conceptual framework to evaluate ppp performance by comparing actual project outcomes to government goals in initiating the partnerships, and to explore how a set of contractual arrangements affect the ppp performance on each identified goal. The framework is applied to a comparative case analysis of highway ppp experiences in the commonwealth of virginia (us) since the 1990s. The results show that these ppp cases were successful in accessing innovative finance, but their performance was mixed on reducing construction risk and transferring revenue risk. Generally improved over time with later projects, the ppp performance was affected not only by interaction among contractual arrangements –private partner selection, financial arrangements, role division, risk allocation, and project characteristics–but also by authorizing and supportive legislation in the policy domain.

AB - This article seeks to answer two research questions: does public-private partnerships (ppp) live up to its promises to government? How do contractual arrangements affect ppp performance? We propose a conceptual framework to evaluate ppp performance by comparing actual project outcomes to government goals in initiating the partnerships, and to explore how a set of contractual arrangements affect the ppp performance on each identified goal. The framework is applied to a comparative case analysis of highway ppp experiences in the commonwealth of virginia (us) since the 1990s. The results show that these ppp cases were successful in accessing innovative finance, but their performance was mixed on reducing construction risk and transferring revenue risk. Generally improved over time with later projects, the ppp performance was affected not only by interaction among contractual arrangements –private partner selection, financial arrangements, role division, risk allocation, and project characteristics–but also by authorizing and supportive legislation in the policy domain.

KW - contractual arrangements

KW - highway development

KW - performance evaluation

KW - public-private partnerships

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038000142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038000142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15309576.2017.1400989

DO - 10.1080/15309576.2017.1400989

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 177

EP - 200

JO - Public Performance & Management Review

JF - Public Performance & Management Review

SN - 1530-9576

IS - 1

ER -