Increasing temperatures associated with climate change will be the next challenge for crop improvement, especially for turfgrass species that are often grown in urban green spaces. Previous research on turfgrass heat stress tolerance has been limited to a small number of species and cultivars with different heat stress conditions between studies; therefore, we assessed heat stress tolerance of 34 turfgrasses representing 14 species. Four replicates of each entry were established for at least 12 wk and then subjected to 49 d of heat stress (35/25 °C day/night) followed by a 4 wk recovery period (25/15 °C day/night). Turfgrass entries were assessed using the normalized difference vegetative index, the percentage of green obtained with digital image analysis, and membrane stability estimated by electrolyte leakage. Buffalograss [Bouteloua dactyloides (Nutt.) J.T. Columbus], Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), tall fescue [Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort], and slender creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra ssp. littoralis) were more tolerant of heat stress than the other species. The Canada bluegrass (Poa compressa L.), blue grama [Bouteloua gracilis (Willd. ex Kunth.) Lag. ex Griffiths], and smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.) cultivars were all tolerant of heat stress; however, only one cultivar for these three species was tested, making species-wide generalizations difficult. In some cases, the cultivars and/or selections within a given species differed in heat stress response. Almost all entries were able to recover from the heat stress by the end of the recovery period. Altogether, we were able to identify turfgrasses that should perform adequately in high-temperature urban environments.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||18|
|State||Published - Nov 1 2020|
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
This work was supported by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Minnesota Local Road Research Board as part of the “Regional Optimization of Roadside Turfgrass Seed Mixtures” project. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Walid Sadok at the University of Minnesota for his advice during project planning, Andrew Hollman for his assistance during the experiments, and Dr. Dominic Petrella for his statistical inputs. Also, we are grateful to Kristine Moncada for her assistance in editing this manuscript.
© 2020 The Authors. Crop Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Crop Science Society of America
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.