Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Performance of four fosfomycin susceptibility testing methods against an international collection of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates
Elizabeth C. Smith
, Hunter Brigman
, Jadyn C. Anderson
, Christopher L. Emery
, Tiffany E. Bias
, Phillip J. Bergen
, Cornelia B. Landersdorfer
,
Elizabeth B. Hirsch
Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
23
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of four fosfomycin susceptibility testing methods against an international collection of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Isolates
100%
Susceptibility Testing
100%
Fosfomycin
100%
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa)
80%
Agar Dilution
80%
Broth Microdilution
80%
Agreement Rate
60%
Escherichia Coli
40%
Clinical Standards
40%
Laboratory Standards
40%
Clinical Application
20%
Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria
20%
Testing Method
20%
Disc Diffusion
20%
Spectrum of Activity
20%
P Stress
20%
European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)
20%
Enterobacterales
20%
MIC Determination
20%
Epidemiological Cut-off Values
20%
Immunology and Microbiology
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
100%
Susceptibility
100%
Agar Dilution
80%
Broth Dilution
80%
Escherichia coli
40%
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
20%
Gram-Negative Bacteria
20%
Etest
20%
Enterobacterales
20%
Antibiotic Sensitivity
20%
Disk Diffusion
20%