Performance of an optimized paper-based test for rapid visual measurement of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in fingerstick and venipuncture samples

Sidhartha Jain, Radha Rajasingham, Farzad Noubary, Erin Coonahan, Ryan Schoeplein, Rachel Baden, Michael Curry, Nezam Afdhal, Shailendra Kumar, Nira R. Pollock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations


Background: A paper-based, multiplexed, microfluidic assay has been developed to visually measure alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in a fingerstick sample, generating rapid, semi-quantitative results. Prior studies indicated a need for improved accuracy; the device was subsequently optimized using an FDA-approved automated platform (Abaxis Piccolo Xpress) as a comparator. Here, we evaluated the performance of the optimized paper test for measurement of ALT in fingerstick blood and serum, as compared to Abaxis and Roche/Hitachi platforms. To evaluate feasibility of remote results interpretation, we also compared reading cell phone camera images of completed tests to reading the device in real time. Methods: 96 ambulatory patients with varied baseline ALT concentration underwent fingerstick testing using the paper device; cell phone images of completed devices were taken and texted to a blinded off-site reader. Venipuncture serum was obtained from 93/96 participants for routine clinical testing (Roche/Hitachi); subsequently, 88/93 serum samples were captured and applied to paper and Abaxis platforms. Paper test and reference standard results were compared by Bland-Altman analysis. Findings: For serum, there was excellent agreement between paper test and Abaxis results, with negligible bias (+4.5 U/L). Abaxis results were systematically 8.6% lower than Roche/Hitachi results. ALT values in fingerstick samples tested on paper were systematically lower than values in paired serum tested on paper (bias -23.6 U/L) or Abaxis (bias -18.4 U/L); a correction factor was developed for the paper device to match fingerstick blood to serum. Visual reads of cell phone images closely matched reads made in real time (bias +5.5 U/L). Conclusions: The paper ALT test is highly accurate for serum testing, matching the reference method against which it was optimized better than the reference methods matched each other. A systematic difference exists between ALT values in fingerstick and paired serum samples, and can be addressed by application of a correction factor to fingerstick values.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0128118
JournalPloS one
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 28 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Jain et al.


Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of an optimized paper-based test for rapid visual measurement of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in fingerstick and venipuncture samples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this